2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: A revisit of the Porter hypothesis

Abstract: This paper examines the relationships between environmental regulations, firms' innovation and private sustainability benefits using nine case studies of UK and Chinese firms. It aims to unravel the mechanisms by which a firm's environmental behaviour in improving its private benefits of sustainability is influenced by its relationship with the government, which primarily enacts regulations to maximise public sustainability benefits in the interests of society as a whole. The paper takes its cue from the Porte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
232
0
10

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 395 publications
(257 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
15
232
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the objective of environmental policies, which aim to increase an industry's ratio of clean‐to‐polluted production systems and improve general consumption (Dröge & Schröder, ). Furthermore, the adoption of green process innovation can help firms enhance their environmental performance and reap the benefits of sustainability and profitability (Hojnik & Ruzzier, ; Huang & Li, ; Ramanathan, He, Black, Ghobadian, & Gallear, ). Therefore, green process innovation is likely to lead to a “win‐win” situation in terms of business performance and social perception (Ghisetti & Rennings, ; Zailani et al, ), playing an important role in maintaining a firm's green image (Chen, ).…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the objective of environmental policies, which aim to increase an industry's ratio of clean‐to‐polluted production systems and improve general consumption (Dröge & Schröder, ). Furthermore, the adoption of green process innovation can help firms enhance their environmental performance and reap the benefits of sustainability and profitability (Hojnik & Ruzzier, ; Huang & Li, ; Ramanathan, He, Black, Ghobadian, & Gallear, ). Therefore, green process innovation is likely to lead to a “win‐win” situation in terms of business performance and social perception (Ghisetti & Rennings, ; Zailani et al, ), playing an important role in maintaining a firm's green image (Chen, ).…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good institutional environment can promote entrepreneurship [29]. Based on the Porter [30] Hypothesis, Ramanathan et al [31] suggest that flexible environmental regulations that encourage enterprises to innovate can drive enterprises to dynamic innovation and have a positive impact on their performance and sustainability. For green entrepreneurship, policy support can also provide momentum.…”
Section: Mechanism Analysis On Green Entrepreneurship Guided By Policmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the Porter hypothesis, the "compensation effect" and "learning effect" of environmental regulation will promote green technology innovation [51]. However, the development of the industry bears high environmental costs, and environmental regulation may also be inversely proportional to green innovation growth [48,52,53]. We use investment in the treatment of environmental pollution by industry as a proxy for environmental regulation (REG).…”
Section: Dynamic Panel Threshold Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%