Environmental Quality and Life Satisfaction

Silva, Jérôme; Keulenaer, Femke de; Johnstone, Nick

doi:10.1787/5k9cw678dlr0-en

Cited by 15 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Regarding environmental quality and quality of life, Silva et al (2012) found that a higher level of air pollution (measured in terms of PM10 concentrations) has a negative impact on individuals' satisfaction with air quality, which leads to a lower level of subjective well-being in both OECD and non-OECD countries. MacKerron and Mourato (2013) showed that individuals in the UK are significantly and substantially happier when outdoors in all green or natural habitat types than they are in urban environments.…”

Section: The Impact Of Satisfaction With Amenity and Environmental Qu...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Satisfaction with Amenities and Taste for Revolt in the Middle East

Gholipour

Farzanegan²

2023

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: The Impact Of Satisfaction With Amenity and Environmental Qu...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Satisfaction with Amenities and Taste for Revolt in the Middle East

Gholipour

Farzanegan²

2023

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Sulphur oxide (SOx) is one of the air pollutants that is organised in PM (Particulate Matters), which have been shown to be particularly harmful to human health. Silva et al (2012) found that air pollution has an impact of satisfaction with air quality, which in turns affects life satisfaction.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Partner countries include China, Colombia and Russia. Data on life satisfaction is drawn from the Gallup World Poll (2004-2013), the European Social Survey (2002-2013), the European Value Survey, the European Quality of Life Survey( -2007( ), Eurobarometer (1973( -2012 and the World Value Survey (…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-dimensional Living Standards

Boarini

Murtin

Schreyer

et al. 2016

OECD Statistics Working Papers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Individual (dis)satisfaction with environmental quality may be related to actual levels of environmental quality. Silva et al (2012) find a significant association between subjective satisfaction with air quality and actual air pollution while Day (2007) notes that perceptions about air pollution and actual air pollution are positively associated. Consequently, if actual environmental quality influences happiness, then perceptions about environmental quality could also affect happiness.…”

Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…Thus, perceptions about environmental quality may directly affect people's happiness. Silva et al (2012) propose a conceptual model that shows how environmental quality (actual air pollution) affects self-reported SWB. The first step takes air quality as a component of the natural environment.…”

Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Three essays on economic growth and the environment : a comparative analysis of developed and developing countries

Sulemana

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This dissertation extends our understanding of the relationships among economic growth, the environment and well-being. It is motivated by the facts that (i) global environmental change and environmental degradation are major policy concerns among world leaders, policymakers and scholars due to their deleterious consequences for human well-being, and (ii) because everyone ultimately wants to be happy, world leaders are increasingly embracing happiness reports as an alternative measure of national well-being. The first essay examines whether, and to what extent, individual perceptions about the seriousness or otherwise of poor local and global environmental quality influences their happiness. As measures of local environmental quality, poor water, poor air, and poor sewage and sanitation in the respondent's own community are considered. The global environmental quality measures include global warming or greenhouse effect, loss of animal or plant species and biodiversity, and the pollution of rivers, lakes and oceans in the world as a whole. The empirical results indicate that while both local and global environmental quality measures diminish happiness for residents of developed countries, only local environmental quality measures have a negative effect on the well-being of people in developing countries. The second essay explores the role of perceived socioeconomic status as a predictor of environmental concern. The results suggest conclusively that in addition to being more likely to choose environmental protection over economic growth and job creation, people who perceive themselves as belonging to the working class, lower middle, upper middle and upper class are significantly more willing to make income sacrifices (i.e., give part of their income and/or agree to pay higher taxes) to prevent environmental pollution than those who believe they are in the lower class in both developed and developing countries. Finally, the third essay studies the relationship between economic growth and environmental pollution within the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) framework. Aside from testing for EKCs for carbon dioxide (CO2) and particulate matter (PM10), it compares turning point incomes for these air pollutants for developed and developing countries. Because democracry is likely to influence the design, implementation and enforcement of environmental laws and regulations, the study empirically tests whether a country's extent of democracy influences its level of air pollution. However, results from fixed and random effects models do not support this claim. Each essay compares developed and developing countries with respect to its outcomes. While the developed countries are a sample of Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, the developing countries are mainly countries in Africa. This focus on African countries is partially anchored on the following reasons. First, the region is the least happy region in the world. Second, it is argued that developing countries are more vulnerable to climate change than developed countries. Climate change and environmental pollution have destructive implications for agricultural productivity, health and human well-being generally. Because agriculture is the main source of livelihood for the majority of Africans, focusing on the region is seemly.

show abstract

Environmental Quality and Life Satisfaction

Cited by 15 publications

References 16 publications

Satisfaction with Amenities and Taste for Revolt in the Middle East

Satisfaction with Amenities and Taste for Revolt in the Middle East

Multi-dimensional Living Standards

Three essays on economic growth and the environment : a comparative analysis of developed and developing countries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About