Environmental pollution cost analyses of a compression ignition diesel engine fuelled with tire pyrolytic oil-diesel blends

Karagöz, Mustafa; Uysal, Cüneyt

doi:10.30939/ijastech..793392

Cited by 8 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The released CO 2 emission are transformed to economic aspects by utilizing the cost of CO 2 . In this framework, the environmental costs are calculated using the following equation [47,49,50]. In this study, the cost of CO 2 is accepted to be C CO2 = 0.0327 $/kg [46].…”

Section: Life Cycle and Pollution Cost Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…During the lifespan of test engine, the CO 2 emission cost arising from the diesel engine is accepted as the total environmental pollution cost (TEP) and it can be found using the following equation [47,49,50]…”

Section: Life Cycle and Pollution Cost Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On the other hand, the life cycle based total environmental pollution cost (TEP LC ) is related to the cost of CO2 emission arising from the engine and the pollution costs arising from the production of the the engine and fuel, as well. TEP LC is determined as follows [47,49,50]:…”

Section: Life Cycle and Pollution Cost Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The mass of the engine is equal to 33 kilograms. The emission amount of the engine material is accepted to be 3.012 kg-CO 2 /kg [47,49,50]. The emission arising from the fuel production process is taken 0.0833 kg-CO 2 /MJ for neat diesel fuel [52], 0.0971 kg-CO 2 /MJ for the methanol [53], and 0.0248 kg-CO 2 /MJ for the ethanol [54].…”

Section: Life Cycle and Pollution Cost Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These two significant points should be well handled together. In recent years, life cycle-based environmental analysis of CO 2 emission arising from internal combustion engines has been, therefore, attracted attention from the fuel researchers [46][47][48][49][50]. Schematically, a general life cycle of conventional diesel fuel based on the well to wheel concept is depicted in Figure 1.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Well to Wheel: A life-cycle based analysis of CI engine powered with diesel and various alcohol blends

Ağbulut

2021

International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The core objective of the present research is to investigate the life cycle-based en-vironmental analysis of a CI engine powered with diesel (DF), diesel (90%) and etha-nol (10%) (E10), and diesel (90%) and methanol (10%) (M10) blends. The data is gathered when the engine runs at a constant engine speed of 1800 rpm, and varying engine loads from 2.5 Nm to 10 Nm with gaps of 2.5 Nm. In the results, higher CO2 emissions are recorded when the engine is fed by E10 and M10 test fuels due to the worsening engine performance and high-oxygen content of relevant alcohols. Cumu-latively, the CO2 emission is higher 17.37% for E10 and 24.76% for M10 test fuel in comparison to that of DF. Given that the life cycle analysis, it is noticed that DF has respectable advantages. In comparison to that of conventional DF, life cycle based total environmental pollution cost of E10 and M10 test fuels is calculated to be high-er by 4.13% and 8.61%, respectively. The highest specific life cycle-based environ-mental values are calculated to be 0.1371 $/kWh, 0.1444 $/kWh, and 0.1607 $/kWh for DF, E10, and M10 test fuels at 2.5 Nm. The highest life cycle based environmen-tal payback pollution values are achieved to be 22.62 years for DF, 23.83 years for E10, and 26.52 years for M10 test fuels at 2.5 Nm. In the conclusion, it is well-noticed that biofuels cannot compete with conventional DF in terms of economical and CO2-based life cycle environmental pollution issues in today’s technology.

show abstract

Section: Life Cycle and Pollution Cost Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Life Cycle and Pollution Cost Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Life Cycle and Pollution Cost Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%