Environmental Performance Evaluation of Key Polluting Industries in China—Taking the Power Industry as an Example

Abstract

This paper analyzes the environmental performance, spatial and temporal characteristics, and optimization paths of key polluting industries, represented here by the power industry, using the super-efficient MinDS model. The study shows that the environmental performance as a whole presents the characteristics of an inverted U-shaped and then a U-shaped trend; each region presents an asymmetric state of convergent development followed by differentiated development, with 2014 as the structural change point; the development trend of environmental performance in each region is divided into three categories (rising, falling, and stable) and four types of spatial clustering (ultra-high, high, medium, and low levels); and input–output indicators of environmental performance in China and across regions have varying degrees of redundancy, with labor input redundancy being the greatest, followed by capital input, technology input, and pollution emissions. On this basis, we propose to improve the monitoring and inspection mechanism of the implementation process of pollution control in key polluting industries and to improve the level of environmental performance of key polluting industries by optimizing the combination of labor, capital, and technology input factors in each region according to local conditions and adopting differentiated strategies. The main contributions of this paper are threefold: first, we incorporate technological inputs into the environmental performance evaluation index system of the electric power industry, which can better reflect the real inputs of the electric power industry and measure the results more accurately; second, we adopt the MinDS model for measuring the environmental performance level, which can quantitatively analyze the gap between each indicator and the optimal level; and third, we propose a redundancy index, which can be used to compare the redundancy of each indicator and then judge the main efficiency levels of the different factors.

Impact of China’s Rural Land Marketization on Ecological Environment Quality Based on Remote Sensing

“…Firstly, China's industry-dominated secondary industry still has high energy consumption, which hinders the adjustment and upgrading of green industries and the improvement of EEQ [31]. Secondly, the discriminatory land supply strategy led by local governments can inhibit the development of China's service industry, lead to the rigidity of the industrial structure, hinder the high-end upgrading of the manufacturing industry, allow the development of local middle and low-end manufacturing industry and worsen EEQ [8].…”

Climate Change, Farm Irrigation Facilities, and Agriculture Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China

“…These studies examine the contribution of farm irrigation facilities to agricultural output with a focus on the associations between these facilities and economic growth, grain production, farmers' income, and the environment [21]. Scholars build performance evaluation index systems of governance and assess their direct performance, indirect performance, and total performance using the DEA model and network analysis following pertinent evaluation criteria such as the 3E, 4E, and IOO models [22]. The DEA Tobit two-step approach, S-SBM model, Malmquist-Luenberger index, three-stage DEA model, and UHSBM model were derived to provide an empirical analysis of infrastructure supply and investment performance from both static and dynamic perspectives, respectively.…”