2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental performance assessment of retrofitting existing coal fired power plants to co-firing with biomass: carbon footprint and emergy approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of coal-biomass mixtures for energy generation through combustion and oxy-fuel combustion processes has the main advantage of reducing CO 2 emissions. On average, there is an 18% reduction in CO 2 emissions when 20% of biomass is added to the mixture, which may vary according to the type of coal being used in the process [33]. Studies on using different environments to investigate the influence of biomass percentage on the co-combustion process of coal in different environments can be found in the literature [34e39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of coal-biomass mixtures for energy generation through combustion and oxy-fuel combustion processes has the main advantage of reducing CO 2 emissions. On average, there is an 18% reduction in CO 2 emissions when 20% of biomass is added to the mixture, which may vary according to the type of coal being used in the process [33]. Studies on using different environments to investigate the influence of biomass percentage on the co-combustion process of coal in different environments can be found in the literature [34e39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative fuels are often, in any case, low value materials with low economic value and not too many other uses. Hence, their use in this application is probably environmentally and economically advantageous (Benhelal et al, 2013;Andrić et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study by Jamali-Zghal et al (2013), Emergy and Carbon Footprint were used together to study to which extent, replacing fossil fuel with biomass for heating is an environmentally friendly solution. In relation to this study, Andrić et al (2014) using the same approach for electricity production determined the maximum supply distance of biomass that allows the cofiring of coal and biomass to be more environmentally efficient than the pure coal combustion. The study showed that the Carbon Footprint and Emergy method are used together to cover all, or at least most, of the significant aspects of the electricity production process that may influence the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at the same time, the various unfavorable environmental effects are simultaneously produced [21], including carbon emissions and their induced disasters [22]. Responding to the whole process of coal exploration and utilization, the carbon footprint is traced and measured by coal supply chains from mining, selection and washing, transportation, distribution and consumption [23,24], especially in the process of power generation [25,26]. Besides, the research into carbon emissions from energy consumption lists is gradually transited to the side view of product consumption [27][28][29], and the relevant method for carbon emissions is adopted to estimate the emission coefficient of each stage in the coal-extracted and -fired process [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%