2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2003.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental performance: an index number approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
140
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 342 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
140
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The growing awareness of the utility of DEA jointly with the need of well-defining inputs and outputs vectors led to new streams of research that not only account for inputs and desirable (good) outputs, but also accommodate undesirable (bad) outputs. The joint treatment of good and bad outputs is a current trend in the banking literature (Park and Weber 2006;Fukuyama and Weber 2010;Barros et al 2012), and -to name just another research stream-has been widely employed for environmental studies (Färe et al 2004;Kumar 2006;Sueyoshi and Goto 2011).…”
Section: Efficiency Assessment In the Presence Of Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growing awareness of the utility of DEA jointly with the need of well-defining inputs and outputs vectors led to new streams of research that not only account for inputs and desirable (good) outputs, but also accommodate undesirable (bad) outputs. The joint treatment of good and bad outputs is a current trend in the banking literature (Park and Weber 2006;Fukuyama and Weber 2010;Barros et al 2012), and -to name just another research stream-has been widely employed for environmental studies (Färe et al 2004;Kumar 2006;Sueyoshi and Goto 2011).…”
Section: Efficiency Assessment In the Presence Of Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a nonparametric analysis of environmental efficiency incorporating undesirable outputs as weak disposable outputs (see the introduction to this paper) Färe et al (2004) have developed an index that is based on the ratio of good to bad outputs. But to our knowledge there exists no measure that allows to evaluate the environmental efficiency of DMUs and to decompose possible inefficiencies into production and abatement inefficiencies.…”
Section: Measuring and Separating Environmental Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first DEA-based CI model proposed by Melyn and Moesen (1991), various indexes have been developed by using the DEA technique. The environmental performance index [Färe et al, 2004], the human development index [Despotis, 2005], the macroeconomic performance index [Ramanathan, 2006], the sustainable energy index [Zhou et al, 2007], the internal market index [Cherchye et al, 2007], the technology achievement index [Cherchye et al, 2008], and the road safety performance index [Hermans, 2009], are examples among others. Furthermore, as a valuable extension of the basic DEA-based CI model, Shen et al (2011; proposed a generalized multiple layer DEA model (MLDEA) and a MLDEA-based CI model, which took the layered hierarchy of indicators into account.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%