2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0048-9697(03)00330-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental odors and health hazards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various commercial smoke detectors and gas sensors are available to detect some of these noxious gases, but many other harmful gases that have deleterious effects on human health often go undetected. Much of the hazard associated with the less-common, injurious organic gases such as ammonia, peroxides, and hydrogen cyanide may be easily detected by an e-nose connected to a centralized audible alarm system [142,154]. Indeed, many such systems are being developed for a wide range of harmful gases and aerosols [139].…”
Section: Applications Of Electronic Noses In Biomedicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various commercial smoke detectors and gas sensors are available to detect some of these noxious gases, but many other harmful gases that have deleterious effects on human health often go undetected. Much of the hazard associated with the less-common, injurious organic gases such as ammonia, peroxides, and hydrogen cyanide may be easily detected by an e-nose connected to a centralized audible alarm system [142,154]. Indeed, many such systems are being developed for a wide range of harmful gases and aerosols [139].…”
Section: Applications Of Electronic Noses In Biomedicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no evidence that malodors per se are associated with objective adverse health effects (Cavalini et al., 1991; Rosenkranz and Cunningham, 2003). However, malodors (as perceived in industrialized cultures, cf.…”
Section: Sensory Irritation and Odormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the human nose has been shown to be sensitive to variations in many odors [6,13]. most people possess the required level of olfactory sensitivity for this type of test, and applying this screen should not add greatly to the workload of the staff running the animal breeding facility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%