2020
DOI: 10.1089/env.2020.0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Migration and Regional Livelihood Planning: A Livelihood Planning Approach to Circular Migration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As one member of a household moves away and sends back money, the liquidity constraints of other household members are relieved, making them more likely to have the financial capacity to move as well (Bernzen et al, 2019). This point is, however, contested in literature where some studies have also found that instead of encouraging future migration (Kleemans, 2015; Tan, 2017; Tiwari & Winters, 2019), remittances may also be used for strengthening a family to remain in their home location (Calero et al, 2009; Das Sharma et al, 2020; Shi et al, 2019). Indeed, many families choose to have a member migrate in order to diversify income and stabilize their finances against future climate shocks (Sakdapolrak et al, 2016; Scheffran et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one member of a household moves away and sends back money, the liquidity constraints of other household members are relieved, making them more likely to have the financial capacity to move as well (Bernzen et al, 2019). This point is, however, contested in literature where some studies have also found that instead of encouraging future migration (Kleemans, 2015; Tan, 2017; Tiwari & Winters, 2019), remittances may also be used for strengthening a family to remain in their home location (Calero et al, 2009; Das Sharma et al, 2020; Shi et al, 2019). Indeed, many families choose to have a member migrate in order to diversify income and stabilize their finances against future climate shocks (Sakdapolrak et al, 2016; Scheffran et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some studies show that liquidity constraints lead to immobility (Bell et al 2021) and improved financial capacity supports the ability to move (Cai et al 2016;Grecequet et al 2017;Benveniste et al 2022;Kartiki 2011), others highlight that improved financial capacity may also lead to "mooring" (Bell et al 2021) where affected populations use their funds to invest and stay in their home locations rather than moving. This is especially seen in cases of mixed family mobility where one member may migrate and later send remittances to provide stability against future climate shocks (Das Sharma et al 2020;Shi et al 2019). While "mooring" illustrates a chosen immobility, another relatively new topic of research explores cases specifically where individuals are motivated to migration, but lack the resources to do so, leading to "trapped populations" (Nawrotzki & DeWaard 2018;Suckall et al 2017).…”
Section: Systems Maps-evaluating Factor Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether migration presents a problem or solution depends on how and whether it is facilitated (Gemenne, 2013). Currently, a cohesive understanding of climate migration amongst governing agencies is lacking (Das Sharma et al, 2020). Successful migration is predicated on the preparedness of migrants and destinations.…”
Section: Challenges and Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%