Abstract:Rare earth elements (REEs) are a collection of 17 chemical elements
that are critical to the functionality of a host of modern commercial
industries including emerging clean energy technologies, electronics,
medical devices, and national defense applications. Despite their
key importance in multiple industries, to-date there has been little
emphasis on environmental systems analysis of REE production. Rapid
growth in these industrial sectors could result in heightened global
demand for REE. As such, assessing … Show more
“…Comparison with other LCA studies is quite difficult because of the use of different functional units (1 kg of REO, 1 kg of REO equivalents, 1 kg of metal, and 1 kg of magnet) as well as life cycle impact assessment methods. With respect to 1 kg of Nd 2 O 3 , climate‐change values of this study (77 kg of carbon dioxide equivalents [CO 2 ‐eq] for BO) are higher than in Koltun and Tharumarajah () (66 kg CO 2 ‐eq) and Zaimes and colleagues () (50 kg CO 2 ‐eq). For a rough comparison with the results from Sprecher and colleagues (), the impact assessment methods applied are additionally calculated by using CML 2001 (Guinée et al.…”
SummaryIn order to address methodological challenges during life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA), this article combines the results of a life cycle assessment (LCA), a life cycle costing, and a social LCA using the example of a complex product: a rare earth permanent magnet for use in wind turbines. The article presents different approaches for combining the results of separate assessments with its attendant methodological challenges. Different normalization, aggregation methods, and weighing factors are applied and their impacts on the results are compared. The underlying case study makes an evaluation of these different methodologies more concrete. Results show that the normalization method applied has a greater influence on the overall results than the aggregation method or weighting factors. Additionally, this study shows that indifference thresholds should be applied to avoid overestimation of small impacts. Indifference thresholds ensure that impact categories with nearly the same results for all analyzed options are treated as identical results. The study also indicates the importance of the question of how much compensation between impacts is desirable. Despite the impact of these factors, the chosen case study of an LCSA for permanent magnets with different supply routes for rare earths shows that the ranking of Chinese production is the most problematic irrespective of the approaches applied.
Keywords:industrial ecology life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) methodology multicriteria decision making normalization rare earth metals
“…Comparison with other LCA studies is quite difficult because of the use of different functional units (1 kg of REO, 1 kg of REO equivalents, 1 kg of metal, and 1 kg of magnet) as well as life cycle impact assessment methods. With respect to 1 kg of Nd 2 O 3 , climate‐change values of this study (77 kg of carbon dioxide equivalents [CO 2 ‐eq] for BO) are higher than in Koltun and Tharumarajah () (66 kg CO 2 ‐eq) and Zaimes and colleagues () (50 kg CO 2 ‐eq). For a rough comparison with the results from Sprecher and colleagues (), the impact assessment methods applied are additionally calculated by using CML 2001 (Guinée et al.…”
SummaryIn order to address methodological challenges during life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA), this article combines the results of a life cycle assessment (LCA), a life cycle costing, and a social LCA using the example of a complex product: a rare earth permanent magnet for use in wind turbines. The article presents different approaches for combining the results of separate assessments with its attendant methodological challenges. Different normalization, aggregation methods, and weighing factors are applied and their impacts on the results are compared. The underlying case study makes an evaluation of these different methodologies more concrete. Results show that the normalization method applied has a greater influence on the overall results than the aggregation method or weighting factors. Additionally, this study shows that indifference thresholds should be applied to avoid overestimation of small impacts. Indifference thresholds ensure that impact categories with nearly the same results for all analyzed options are treated as identical results. The study also indicates the importance of the question of how much compensation between impacts is desirable. Despite the impact of these factors, the chosen case study of an LCSA for permanent magnets with different supply routes for rare earths shows that the ranking of Chinese production is the most problematic irrespective of the approaches applied.
Keywords:industrial ecology life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) methodology multicriteria decision making normalization rare earth metals
“…In particular, the availability of Nd for the synthesis of corrosion inhibitors can be attractive if the new technologies for the recycling of rare earths are considered [21][22][23][24]. erefore, in this study, the corrosion inhibitory capacity of neodymium chloride on API X70 steel in a 3.5% NaCl solution at room temperature is evaluated.…”
In this study, the effect of the addition of Nd 3+ ions as a corrosion inhibitor of the API X70 steel in a medium rich in chlorides was evaluated. e performance of the Nd 3+ ions was evaluated by means of electrochemical techniques such as potentiodynamic polarization curves, open circuit potential measurements, linear polarization resistance, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, as well as by means of scanning electron microscopy and EDS measurements. e results showed that Nd 3+ ions reduce the corrosion rate of steel at concentrations as low as 0.001 M Nd 3+ . At higher concentrations, the inhibition efficiency was only slightly affected although the concentration of chloride ions was increased by the addition of the inhibitor. e adsorption of the Nd 3+ ions promotes the formation of a protective layer of oxides/hydroxides on the metal surface, thereby reducing the exchange rate of electrons. Nd 3+ ions act as a mixed inhibitor with a strong predominant cathodic effect.
“…Altogether, the production process is fairly energy and materials intensive (Peiro and Mendez ; Zaimes et al. ) and generates significant quantities of pollution that includes radioactive waste, hydrogen fluoride (HF), and acidic waste water (Hurst ; Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection ). So far, life cycle studies on rare earths production in China have all focused solely on the production chain in Bayan Obo (Schüler et al.…”
Summary
Over the past decade, China has supplied over 90% of global rare earths, and in doing so bore significant environmental burdens from processing its complex ores. In this study, we used life cycle assessment to quantify environmental impacts for producing 1 kilogram (kg) of 15 rare earth elements from each major production pathway. The scope of assessment included the largest rare earth oxide (REO) production chain in Bayan Obo, as well as lesser known production chains for bastnäsite in Sichuan and in‐situ leaching of kaolin clays in the Seven Southern Provinces of China. This was followed by assessing impacts from the three major metal refining processes: molten salt electrolysis, calciothermic reduction, and lanthanothermic reduction. Among 11 impact categories assessed, results were highest for human toxicity that ranged between 13.1 and 50.4 kg 1,4‐dichlorobenzene‐eq (equivalent)/kg of rare earth metal−1, followed by eutrophication (0.04 to 1.26 kg phosphate‐eq/kg of rare earth metal−1), abiotic depletion potential of fossil fuels (592 to 1,857 megajoules per kg of rare earth metal−1), acidification (0.25 to 0.87 kg sulfur dioxide‐eq/kg of rare earth metal−1), and global warming (39.1 to 109.6 kg carbon dioxide‐eq/kg of rare earth metal−1) potentials. Regionally, impacts in Sichuan were lower across all key impact categories than in Bayan Obo: 32% lower for human toxicity, 67% lower for eutrophication, 58% lower for acidification, and 45% lower for global warming. A scenario analysis between the industry average and best available technologies revealed considerable potential to mitigate impacts across all production chains, particularly by improving waste treatment practices.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.