2021
DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2021.1916899
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental justice in Phoenix, Arizona: a neighbourhood deficit and asset score

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data on mortality and morbidity caused by contamination reflect the systemic and structural character of environmental injustice. The most exposed groups are disproportionately more frequently the object of environmental safety threats-a number of research papers demonstrate higher exposure to negative environmental factors in the place of residence of minorities or persons with low income [10,[23][24][25][26][27][28]. According to Eckerd and Keller [29], as well as Cambell and Peck [30], it is difficult to determine whether hazardous substances are located in the places of residence of minorities or people with low income, or perhaps that such people choose areas in the vicinity of substances hazardous for residence due to lower prices, whereas the wealthier part of society moves out of the hazardous areas.…”
Section: Environmental Justice and Slow Violence In Spatial Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on mortality and morbidity caused by contamination reflect the systemic and structural character of environmental injustice. The most exposed groups are disproportionately more frequently the object of environmental safety threats-a number of research papers demonstrate higher exposure to negative environmental factors in the place of residence of minorities or persons with low income [10,[23][24][25][26][27][28]. According to Eckerd and Keller [29], as well as Cambell and Peck [30], it is difficult to determine whether hazardous substances are located in the places of residence of minorities or people with low income, or perhaps that such people choose areas in the vicinity of substances hazardous for residence due to lower prices, whereas the wealthier part of society moves out of the hazardous areas.…”
Section: Environmental Justice and Slow Violence In Spatial Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large share of Latinx and African American communities lives here, and, despite efforts by nonprofit organizations and the city administration, educational and economic opportunities are still underdeveloped. Compared with other areas, housing prices are low, and levels of air pollution and obesity are high (Boucher et al., 2021; Cutts et al., 2009). Although historically a place of agricultural production, South Phoenix is a food desert with little or no access to fresh, affordable, and healthy food in walkable distance (USDA, 2017).…”
Section: Developing a Sustainable Food Forest Enterprise In Phoenix Azmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demographic factors are often calibrated to the local area of study; for example, Zalzal and Hatzoupoulou used the Ontario Marginalization Index (comprised of four socioeconomic variables: residential instability, material deprivation, dependence, and ethnic concentration) and compared this index value to exposure to traffic-related air pollution (Zalzal & Hatzopoulou, 2022). Boucher et al used demographic indicators as independent variables in a regression analysis that asked whether these demographic indicators predicted a neighborhood asset score, which was co-created with a community partner organization (Boucher et al, 2021). Specifying local context and co-creating research with community organizations are two best practices in conducting an environmental justice analysis in a single location.…”
Section: Climate and Economic Justice Screening Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies, however, do not incorporate multiple environmental harms into their analysis and only focus on one measure of pollution, such as Toxic Release Inventory sites, Clean Air Act Violations, or air pollutants (Konisky & Reenock, 2013;McLeod et al, 2000;Wu & Heberling, 2013). Some research incorporates environmental benefits such as parks, woodlands and nature preserves, or vegetation, as opposed to environmental hazards (Boone et al, 2009;Boucher et al, 2021;Fairburn et al, 2009;Schwarz et al, 2018).…”
Section: Climate and Economic Justice Screening Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%