2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13644-020-00409-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Justice Activism: A Transformative, Contemporary Nature Religion

Abstract: Our in-depth study of 12, spiritual but not religious (SBNR), participants arrested to protect nature as sacred presents a case to consider the religious and spiritual meanings of contemporary environmental and ecology movements. Through a lived religious approach to participants’ narratives of environmental justice (ENVJ) activism, this paper identified four themes— reconstructing self and nature, re- envisioning social and moral life, living with vulnerability, and practices of spiritual and cultural work—wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Qualitative studies could also help elucidate for whom sanctification is relevant. For example, Deal & O'Grady, 2020 found links between the nontheistic sanctification of nature and psychosocial functioning for nontheist environmental justice activists despite these same participants endorsing a neutral score on the sacred adjectives scale (Deal & Magyar-Russell, 2018). Finally, researchers need to report the correlation between theistic and nontheistic scales if both are used, and offer a clear rationale for their choices in selecting the subscale(s) used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative studies could also help elucidate for whom sanctification is relevant. For example, Deal & O'Grady, 2020 found links between the nontheistic sanctification of nature and psychosocial functioning for nontheist environmental justice activists despite these same participants endorsing a neutral score on the sacred adjectives scale (Deal & Magyar-Russell, 2018). Finally, researchers need to report the correlation between theistic and nontheistic scales if both are used, and offer a clear rationale for their choices in selecting the subscale(s) used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This nontheistic sacred has also been referred to as the 'secular sacred' (Knott, 2013;Bennett, 2014). Despite this theoretical work in expanding the notion of the sacred beyond the religious sphere and the contested difficulties that stem from that expansion (Deal & Magyar-Russell, 2018), there hasn't been much empirical exploration of how different or similar the nontheistic sacred might be in the context of a secular culture, particularly its psychological functions, with the exception of recent work (Deal et al 2022;Deal & O'Grady, 2020) that looked at the sanctification of nature for environmental activists, which evidenced a transformative role of the nontheistic sacred for identity, coping, and participation in society that is emotionally intense. A potential negative consequence of such functions is that when the value of the sacred is breached, such as when aspects of nature that are perceived as sacred as violated or destroyed, so is its meaning-making and comforting function, leading to negative psychological effects.…”
Section: The Nontheistic Sacred: Psychological Functions Of Metal Mus...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is one part of a larger project investigating the dynamics of nature as sacred for nontheists (Deal & Magyar-Russell, 2018; Deal & O’Grady, 2020). The aim, herein, is to address two gaps in the sanctification literature: (a) how do perceptions of the sacred develop and (b) how does the theory of nontheistic sanctification compare with the actual experiences of nontheists.…”
Section: The Present Study and Its Significancementioning
confidence: 99%