The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1521332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental integrity of international carbon market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The carbon market defines virtual carbon emission rights as scarce valuable assets, gives them commodity attributes, and realizes the target of resource allocation and emission reduction through market transaction among reduction entities. The signing of the Paris Agreement in December 2015 further highlights the carbon market's capital allocation for achieving emission reduction on a global scale [1]. As a core issue of the carbon market mechanism, accurate forecasting of the carbon price can develop an efficient carbon pricing mechanism, and also help investors to avoid market risks and to increase returns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carbon market defines virtual carbon emission rights as scarce valuable assets, gives them commodity attributes, and realizes the target of resource allocation and emission reduction through market transaction among reduction entities. The signing of the Paris Agreement in December 2015 further highlights the carbon market's capital allocation for achieving emission reduction on a global scale [1]. As a core issue of the carbon market mechanism, accurate forecasting of the carbon price can develop an efficient carbon pricing mechanism, and also help investors to avoid market risks and to increase returns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly all states of the world could not claim mitigation outcomes, otherwise it would dilute the incentive for blue carbon protection, if not neutralize it altogether. Relatedly, ensuring additionality of enhanced carbon sinks and preventing double-counting of emission abatement efforts are common concerns within international climate change policy and an ongoing theme of Article 6 Rulebook negotiations (Schneider & Theuer, 2018).…”
Section: Attribution and Additionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While carbon pricing and carbon accounting methodologies are constrained by estimation based accounting frameworks, carbon trading platforms and pricing initiatives are rapidly expanding (e.g., 45 national, 25 subnational jurisdictions 124 ) emphasizing the importance of shared methodology for forest carbon sequestration product offerings for expanding trading platforms. Although it is not clear how REDD+ will be integrated within the Paris Agreement (e.g., Article 6) 125 or into existing compliance markets 126 , improved quantification of forest carbon sequestration links these entities and mechanisms together in a harmonized universal science-based transactional framework. For example, forest carbon offsets sourced in China are verified and traded as equivalent to those originating from Africa, the United States, Canada, Mexico and other national and sub-national platforms, potentially improving market liquidity and reducing costs of compliance 127 .…”
Section: Co 2 Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%