2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental incomes sustained as provisioning ecosystem service availability declines along a woodland resource gradient in Zimbabwe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, moving from a 10 to 5 cm threshold can easily triple the number of trees that need to be recorded and tagged, especially in heavily disturbed woodlands. However, there is sometimes a large pool of woody species that never attain a large DBH, and these will be missed when large size thresholds are used (Table 1; Nieto‐Quintano et al., 2018; Pritchard et al., 2019).…”
Section: Key Challenges To Long‐term Monitoring and The Seosaw Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, moving from a 10 to 5 cm threshold can easily triple the number of trees that need to be recorded and tagged, especially in heavily disturbed woodlands. However, there is sometimes a large pool of woody species that never attain a large DBH, and these will be missed when large size thresholds are used (Table 1; Nieto‐Quintano et al., 2018; Pritchard et al., 2019).…”
Section: Key Challenges To Long‐term Monitoring and The Seosaw Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in R (R Core Team, 2020) used(Table 1;Nieto-Quintano et al, 2018;Pritchard et al, 2019).To achieve some standardization, the SEOSAW manual recommends either a 3 cm or 5 cm diameter threshold for inclusion (D t ), with the diameter measurement being made at either 0.3 or 1.3 m height (a.k.a. the point of measurement or POM; NB the POM should always be moved if there is a deformity or swelling at the standard height).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluctuations in availability of capital resources and inputs, seasonality of capital input utilization, and changes in political economy variables shaping access, create challenges for rural households in income diversification endeavours (Hassan, Hossain, Sultana, & Ghosh, 2015;Joshi, Gulati, Birthal, & Twari, 2003). Although the economic drivers of income diversification recognizes the role of world markets and unaffordable credit in income diversification, political economy and policy drivers, such as misguided government programmes, create the most devastating stresses and shocks for the quality of life of rural populations (Hansson, Ferguson & Olofsson, 2010;Pritchard, Grundy, Horst, & Ryan, 2019).…”
Section: Income Diversification and Household Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between income diversification and economic welfare is one of consumption decisions for the sake of well-being (Bebbington, 1999;Singh, et al, 1986;Pritchard, et al, 2019). Rural household consumption emphasizes necessities such as food, clothing, medicine, shelter, and amenities such as electricity, transport and household goods such as radios and motor bikes.…”
Section: Overall Effect Of Income Diversification On Economic Welfarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most ES assessments in forests have used economic approaches [39], whereas biophysical and social assessment methods need to be further investigated in these complex social-ecological systems. Only few studies conducted ES integrated assessment in tropical forests, for instance, in southern African woodlands with the identification of human-induced processes impacting ES supply [40] and the analysis of relationships between the supply of provisioning services and environmental income of local populations [41], or in Latin America where interdisciplinary approaches allowed providing concrete policy recommendations [42]. In particular, no integrated ES assessment has been conducted in Central Africa, where the livelihoods of rural populations deeply rely on forest ecosystems in a context of high-poverty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%