2022
DOI: 10.2495/eq-v7-n3-245-256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental impacts of waste-to-energy processes in mountainous areas: The case of an Alpine region

Abstract: Despite the efforts made towards circularity approaches in waste management, waste-to-energy (WtE) processes still represent a key step because they allow recovering energy from waste, reducing the amount of waste residuals that require landfill disposal and reusing part of the residuals for specific purposes (e.g. in the construction sector). However, the direct (incineration) or indirect (gasification) combustion of waste generates relatively high emissions of several air pollutants, with different levels of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more economically and environmentally sustainable opportunity is given by waste gasification: instead of burning the syngas generated in the gasification stage, it is possible to convert it into chemicals (e.g., methanol, ethanol, hydrogen, dimethyl ether) that may also partly replace fossil fuels, also preventing odour problems. This way, both local and global environmental impacts would be reduced, as indicated also in recent literature [41], [42].…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…A more economically and environmentally sustainable opportunity is given by waste gasification: instead of burning the syngas generated in the gasification stage, it is possible to convert it into chemicals (e.g., methanol, ethanol, hydrogen, dimethyl ether) that may also partly replace fossil fuels, also preventing odour problems. This way, both local and global environmental impacts would be reduced, as indicated also in recent literature [41], [42].…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 61%