2013
DOI: 10.1007/s13203-013-0029-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental impacts of ethylene production from diverse feedstocks and energy sources

Abstract: Quantitative cradle-to-gate environmental impacts for ethylene production from naphtha (petroleum crude), ethane (natural gas) and ethanol (corn-based) are predicted using GaBi Ò software. A comparison reveals that the majority of the predicted environmental impacts for these feedstocks fall within the same order of magnitude. Soil and water pollution associated with corn-based ethylene are however much higher. The main causative factor for greenhouse gas emissions, acidification and air pollution is the burni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
77
2
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
77
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Ethylene is primarily obtained from thermal cracking of natural gas and petroleum, 3 but this method of production unfortunately releases into the atmosphere large quantities of CO 2 and other greenhouse gases with consequent negative environmental impacts. 4 Therefore, technologies are required that produce ethylene from renewable resources. Examples of these alternative or “green” methods include production of ethylene from biomass 56 and the use of genetically engineered microorganisms including yeast, 78 Escherichia coli , 910 and cyanobacteria 1116 that express the efe gene encoding an ethylene-forming enzyme (EFE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Ethylene is primarily obtained from thermal cracking of natural gas and petroleum, 3 but this method of production unfortunately releases into the atmosphere large quantities of CO 2 and other greenhouse gases with consequent negative environmental impacts. 4 Therefore, technologies are required that produce ethylene from renewable resources. Examples of these alternative or “green” methods include production of ethylene from biomass 56 and the use of genetically engineered microorganisms including yeast, 78 Escherichia coli , 910 and cyanobacteria 1116 that express the efe gene encoding an ethylene-forming enzyme (EFE).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, butenoic acid is produced chemically from butenoic aldehyde and the original source is petroleum. Butenoic acid production by petroleum needs four steps: from petroleum to ethylene (Ghanta et al 2013), from ethylene to acetaldehyde (Vanderheide et al 1992), from acetaldehyde to butenoic aldehyde, and from butenoic aldehyde to butenoic acid (Schulz et al 2000). However, this chemical pathway to produce butenoic acid is costly because of the fast-rising petroleum prices, and ethylene as a petroleum derivative has increased in price as well (Masih et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43] Note that the predicted cradle-to-gate impacts are considerably greater than the gate-to-gatee missions. For ethylene production from CO 2 and "renewable" H 2 (H 2ren ), where renewable indicates the production of H 2 by water electrolysis using renewable electrical energy sources, there are no equivalent reported data.…”
Section: Is It Realistic To Conceive Re-driven Chemistry?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…More specifically,t he comparison ( Figure 1) referstot he predicted cradle-to-gate environmental impactsa ssociated with manufacturing 400 000 tonneso fe thylene from naphtha, ethane, and ethanolu sing natural gas as energy source in all cases. [43] Note that the predicted cradle-to-gate impacts are considerably greater than the gate-to-gatee missions. For ethylene production from CO 2 and "renewable" H 2 (H 2ren ), where renewable indicates the production of H 2 by water electrolysis using renewable electrical energy sources, there are no equivalent reported data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation