2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental impact on the temporal production of chasmogamous and cleistogamous flowers in the mixed breeding system of Viola pubescens

Abstract: Viola pubescens is a perennial, mixed breeding herb that produces both chasmogamous and cleistogamous flowers at different times of the season. Once bud type is specified, it does not convert from one form to the other. While temporal production of the two flowers is known to be influenced by environmental factors, the specific environmental cues that signal emergence of each flower type have not been empirically studied. To investigate the environmental parameters driving seasonal development of chasmogamous … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, cleistogamy expression in C. broussonetii would be mainly prompted by abiotic factors such as degraded microenvironmental conditions, as documented elsewhere for other CL species ( e.g . Uphof 1938; Stojanova et al 2020; Furukawa et al 2020; Sternberger et al 2020). However, despite the lack of influence of the pollination environment in the expression of cleistogamy in our study sites, we did observe differences in the relative reproductive success between CH and CL flowers in burned sites, where CH flowers set more seeds than CL flowers in both low and high fire frequency conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, cleistogamy expression in C. broussonetii would be mainly prompted by abiotic factors such as degraded microenvironmental conditions, as documented elsewhere for other CL species ( e.g . Uphof 1938; Stojanova et al 2020; Furukawa et al 2020; Sternberger et al 2020). However, despite the lack of influence of the pollination environment in the expression of cleistogamy in our study sites, we did observe differences in the relative reproductive success between CH and CL flowers in burned sites, where CH flowers set more seeds than CL flowers in both low and high fire frequency conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CH flowers, in contrast, when cross‐pollinated, produce genetically diverse progeny, thereby maintaining or increasing genetic diversity (Culley & Klooster 2007; Koontz et al 2017). While the production of CL and CH flowers can be determined by genetic factors, biotic and abiotic factors are highly relevant for triggering the occurrence of cleistogamy as either an adaptive strategy or simply as a plastic response to enviromental changes (Clay 1983; Schoen & Lloyd 1984; Sternberger et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cleistogamy might be beneficial in unfavorable environmental and resource-poor conditions where the abundance of pollinators is drastically reduced, and self-pollinated CL flowers assure reproductive success [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. This breeding system is plastic, and the frequency of CL and CH flowers on an individual plant and the timing of flowering may vary depending on environmental conditions as adaptation to heterogenous habitats [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cleistogamy is relatively common in V iola , the largest genus in the family Violaceae, comprising ca. 600 species distributed mainly in the Northern Hemisphere [ 24 , 25 ], which has been used as a good model for studying cleistogamy [ 5 , 11 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Most North Hemisphere Viola sections are characterized by seasonal cleistogamy in which CH and CL flowers do not develop simultaneously on an individual plant, but temporal production of CH and CL flowers is strongly influenced by environmental factors such as light quantity, canopy cover, photoperiod, temperature, soil pH and moisture [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%