2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental impact of primary beef production chain in Colombia: Carbon footprint, non-renewable energy and land use using Life Cycle Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution of animal sources such as enteric fermentation and excretions deposited on pastures to total GHGE emissions was high, a common finding reported for cattle systems where CH 4 and N 2 O are the most critical GHGE requiring mitigation actions (Gerber et al, 2013). A similar pattern was reported for beef cattle systems and grazing dairy production systems in Latin America, where emissions from bovines represented most of the total GHGE (Cerri et al, 2016;Costantini et al, 2020;de Léis et al, 2015;González-Quintero et al, 2021b, 2021aLizarralde et al, 2014;Ribeiro-Filho et al, 2020). As a general trend in all the productive orientations, the contribution to total GHGE of off-farm emissions from inputs manufacturing was low when compared to more intensive farming systems located in developed countries (Lesschen et al, 2011;Pelletier et al, 2010).…”
Section: Quantifications Of Meat and Milk Yield Gaps And Potential Productivitiessupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The contribution of animal sources such as enteric fermentation and excretions deposited on pastures to total GHGE emissions was high, a common finding reported for cattle systems where CH 4 and N 2 O are the most critical GHGE requiring mitigation actions (Gerber et al, 2013). A similar pattern was reported for beef cattle systems and grazing dairy production systems in Latin America, where emissions from bovines represented most of the total GHGE (Cerri et al, 2016;Costantini et al, 2020;de Léis et al, 2015;González-Quintero et al, 2021b, 2021aLizarralde et al, 2014;Ribeiro-Filho et al, 2020). As a general trend in all the productive orientations, the contribution to total GHGE of off-farm emissions from inputs manufacturing was low when compared to more intensive farming systems located in developed countries (Lesschen et al, 2011;Pelletier et al, 2010).…”
Section: Quantifications Of Meat and Milk Yield Gaps And Potential Productivitiessupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The inverse correlation between GHGE intensity and productivity of beef and dairy cattle production systems has been documented by several studies at a global scale (Gerber et al, 2011(Gerber et al, , 2010(Gerber et al, , 2013, and at regional level in Latin American (de Léis et al, 2015;Gaitán et al, 2016;González-Quintero et al, 2021a, 2021bMorel et al, 2016;Nieto et al, 2018), which indicates the strong influence of increasing the meat and milk production on the dilution of GHGE. This study makes a further contribution to these findings, as we found that considerable GHGE mitigation potentials are achievable by the less productive farms when increase their productivity.…”
Section: Gondelachmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the beef commercialized in Colombia comes from fattening farms, representing 39% of the beef national herd [17]. Fattening farms depend mostly on cow-calf farms for weaning calves, and at a lower extent on dual-purpose farms [18]. The different growth stages along the cattle's life cycle are usually carried out in different farms.…”
Section: Cattle Production Systems In Colombiamentioning
confidence: 99%