Environmental Impact of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the United States: An Estimate of the Carbon Dioxide Footprint

Abstract

Purpose: To attempt to quantitate the carbon footprint of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) through approximated scope 1 to 3 CO 2 emissions to identify its potential role in global warming. Patients and Methods: To estimate national usage, we determined the number of inpatient and outpatient MIS procedures using International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision-clinical modification codes for all MIS procedures in a 2009 sample collected in national databases. Need for surgery was considered essential, and therefore traditional open surgery was used as the comparator. Scope 1 (direct) CO 2 emissions resulting from CO 2 gas used for insufflation were based on both escaping procedural CO 2 and metabolic CO 2 eliminated via respiration. Scopes 2 and 3 (indirect) emissions related to capture, compression, and transportation of CO 2 to hospitals and the disposal of single-use equipment not used in open surgery were calculated. Results: The total CO 2 emissions were calculated to be 355,924 tonnes/year. For perspective, if MIS in the United States was considered a country, it would rank 189th on the United Nations 2008 list of countries' carbon emissions per year. Limitations include the inability to account for uncertainty using the various models and tools for approximating CO 2 emissions. Conclusion: CO 2 emission of MIS in the United States may have a significant environmental impact. This is the first attempt to quantify CO 2 emissions related to MIS in the United States. Strategies for reduction, while maintaining high quality medical care, should be considered.

Carbon footprint of robotically‐assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy: a comparison

“…Travel to and from healthcare facilities, excluding any direct healthcare activities that occur within, accounts for as much as 38% of the GHG emissions associated with healthcare services . Energy consumption and landfill waste production, however, account for the majority of the environmental effect of the healthcare industry . Of US energy, 9% is consumed by the healthcare industry to support energy‐intensive medical equipment, including high‐intensity lighting and 24 h operating schedules .…”

Environmental impact and life cycle financial cost of hybrid (reusable/ single-use) instruments versus single-use equivalents in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

“…The carbon footprint of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy has not previously been estimated, but the carbon footprint of the CO 2 gas used for abdominal insufflation in laparoscopic or other procedures has been estimated at 141 kg CO 2 e per operation, (27) As with all LCAs, our analysis is limited by assumptions, the system boundary (products and processes included), parameter uncertainty (potential inaccuracy in the primary activity data, and emission factors embedded within SimaPro), and model uncertainty (limitation of the extent to which our model reflects reality). Nevertheless, our scenario modelling found hybrid laparoscopic instruments remained preferable to single-use equivalents even if there was infrequent reuse of hybrid instruments, if hybrid clip appliers were packaged and decontaminated separately to the main instrument set, if using a fossil-fuel rich source for decontamination, or if switching international transport of single-use equipment to shipping in preference to air-freight.…”

Laparoscopy Using Room Air Insufflation in a Rural African Jungle Hospital: The Bongolo Hospital Experience, January 2006 to December 2013

“…1 However, there are efforts underway to identify alternative insufflation gases. 5 Other accepted options for gas insufflation that have not as yet proved superior to CO 2 include helium and nitrous oxide. 6 Although room air is cheap and easily available, there are 2 concerns with using room air insufflation: the risk of combustion with the use of diathermy and the risk of fatal air embolism due to its slow absorption.…”