Environmental heterogeneity predicts global species richness patterns better than area

Abstract

Aim It is widely accepted that biodiversity is influenced by both niche‐related and spatial processes from local to global scales. Their relative importance, however, is still disputed, and empirical tests are surprisingly scarce at the global scale. Here, we compare the importance of area (as a proxy for pure spatial processes) and environmental heterogeneity (as a proxy for niche‐related processes) for predicting native mammal species richness world‐wide and within biogeographical regions. Location Global. Time period We analyse a spatial snapshot of richness data collated by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. Major taxa studied All terrestrial mammal species, including possibly extinct species and species with uncertain presence. Methods We applied a spreading dye algorithm to analyse how native mammal species richness changes with area and environmental heterogeneity. As measures for environmental heterogeneity, we used elevation ranges and precipitation ranges, which are well‐known correlates of species richness. Results We found that environmental heterogeneity explained species richness relationships better than did area, suggesting that niche‐related processes are more prevalent than pure area effects at broad scales. Main conclusions Our results imply that niche‐related processes are essential to understand broad‐scale species–area relationships and that habitat diversity is more important than area alone for the protection of global biodiversity.

A mechanistic density functional theory for ecology across scales

“…In declaring the prey densities of Deer ρ 2 =]n 2 [ and Pig ρ 3 =]n 3 [ as separate resources for the Cat, we stipulate its reliance on each, cf. equation (7). If either prey could maintain the Cat, the combined resource density n 2 + ω n 3 were to replace ρ 2 = n 2 and ρ 3 = n 3 , with a ratio ω to be specified.…”

“…4. We ensure that resources can be exploited to a significant degree by choosing moderate with respect to the energy scale set by ζ = 1 in equation (7)…”

“…The rate of consumption is irrelevant since ρ k (r) is replenished at the same rate in equilibrium. For example, a 50-hectare pasture that grows biomass at 20 kg/(ha day) sustains an equilibrium abundance of 50 cows (each requiring 20 kg of grass daily), such that we may choose ν = 20 and ρ = 1000 in equation (7). Expressing E Res as the sum of…”

“…Without loss of generality we fix the unit of length via A = 1, which amounts to 1 mL suspension by our definition. The unit of energy is then implicitly fixed via ζ = 1 in equation (7).…”

“…Cerophyl concentrations are given in units of 1.8 g/litre. The unit of energy is fixed by ζ = 1, see equation (7), and length by A = 1000. The Cerophyl resource for P is maintained at constant concentration ρ c , while P itself serves as resource for D. The data in Ref.…”