2014
DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2013.843510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental gentrification in a post-industrial landscape: the case of the Limhamn quarry, Malmö, Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not to say, in a normative sense, that tree planting efforts are always good, and cannot be coopted or commenced for other less desirable purposes, especially in time of great upheaval such as disasters or war (see earlier reference to Braverman 2009). There is a large and growing literature that makes disturbing connections between "greening" activities such as tree planting and gentrification and/ or displacement (see for example Checker 2011, Eckerd 2011, Gould and Lewis 2012, Sandberg 2014. Though from an environmental justice perspective this outcome is to be avoided at all costs, an unfortunate consequence of this thinking is that creation of new boundaries between humans, especially of a certain class or ethnicity, and the rest of the social-ecological systems within which we reside, perhaps unwittingly, reinforces the most poisonous dichotomy of all, that humans are separate from so-called nature (Harvey 1997, Castree andBraun 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not to say, in a normative sense, that tree planting efforts are always good, and cannot be coopted or commenced for other less desirable purposes, especially in time of great upheaval such as disasters or war (see earlier reference to Braverman 2009). There is a large and growing literature that makes disturbing connections between "greening" activities such as tree planting and gentrification and/ or displacement (see for example Checker 2011, Eckerd 2011, Gould and Lewis 2012, Sandberg 2014. Though from an environmental justice perspective this outcome is to be avoided at all costs, an unfortunate consequence of this thinking is that creation of new boundaries between humans, especially of a certain class or ethnicity, and the rest of the social-ecological systems within which we reside, perhaps unwittingly, reinforces the most poisonous dichotomy of all, that humans are separate from so-called nature (Harvey 1997, Castree andBraun 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, any tax consequences associated with the investments would be absorbed by increases in property valuation and/or rent payers. This pathway is a derivative of the well-developed concept of 'Green Gentrification,' wherein investments in sustainability amenities and infrastructure are unevenly distributed or otherwise associated with gentrification (Checker 2011, Curran and Hamilton 2012, Bryson 2013, Sandberg 2014, Curran and Hamilton 2017, Gould and Lewis 2017, Anguelovski et al 2018. Although not widely studied, the exemplar case for this pathway is the St. Kjeld Climate District in Copenhagen where a broader resilience strategy to revitalize a neighborhood led to some displacement from increased rents (Kjaer 2015) and the marginalization of existing homeowners (Baron and Petersen 2016).…”
Section: Climate Gentrificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This form of gentrification appears in the literature with a variety of names: ‘ecological gentrification’ (Dooling, ; ), ‘eco‐gentrification’ (Cucca, ; Rice et al ., ), ‘green gentrification’ (Gould and Lewis, ; Anguelovski et al ., ; Anguelovski et al ., ), ‘environmental gentrification’ (Checker, ; Curran and Hamilton, ; Pearsall, ; Sandberg, ) and ‘(low‐)carbon gentrification’ (Bouzarovski et al ., ; Rice et al ., ). Whatever name is used, the process is generally defined by ‘new or intensified urban socio‐spatial inequities produced by urban greening agendas and interventions, such as greenways, parks, community gardens, ecological corridors, or green infrastructure’ (Anguelovski et al ., : 1‐2).…”
Section: Ecological Gentrification: (Un)intended Consequence or Justimentioning
confidence: 99%