2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental genomics of Late Pleistocene black bears and giant short-faced bears

Abstract: Highlights d We recovered genomic data from ancient bears directly from cave sediments d Ancient Mexican black bears are ancestrally related to Eastern American black bears d The Mexican and Yukon populations of extinct giant shortfaced bears were distinct d Our results bring ancient eDNA into the era of population genomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our workflow can be applied to any nonrecombining data set, including, but not limited to, the Y-chromosome and the mitochondrial genome, and can also be used for phylogenetic placement of environmental DNA samples into preestimated trees. PathPhynder has already been used to place ancient environmental bear DNA into a mitochondrial phylogeny ( Pedersen et al 2021 ). It is also possible to construct mitochondrial and possibly Y-chromosome trees using exclusively ancient samples, and then use pathPhynder to place additional, lower coverage aDNA data, as recently done for environmental mammoth mtDNA ( Wang, Pedersen, et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our workflow can be applied to any nonrecombining data set, including, but not limited to, the Y-chromosome and the mitochondrial genome, and can also be used for phylogenetic placement of environmental DNA samples into preestimated trees. PathPhynder has already been used to place ancient environmental bear DNA into a mitochondrial phylogeny ( Pedersen et al 2021 ). It is also possible to construct mitochondrial and possibly Y-chromosome trees using exclusively ancient samples, and then use pathPhynder to place additional, lower coverage aDNA data, as recently done for environmental mammoth mtDNA ( Wang, Pedersen, et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods include shotgun metagenomics, whereby any molecules in the sedaDNA mixture are randomly sequenced (e.g. [15,36,[43][44][45][46]), and target enrichment, in which sedaDNA molecules of interest are selectively enriched prior to sequencing (e.g. barcode or mitochondrial loci [16,[47][48][49]).…”
Section: Sedimentary Ancient Dna Adds Another Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the application of shotgun metagenomics and target enrichment approaches, it is now possible to recover haplotypic and genomic information directly from sedaDNA [43][44][45][47][48][49], which enables the exploration of populationlevel changes and has the potential to detect the arrival or disappearance of alleles and lineages in a region, as recently showcased for Neanderthals from a cave in Spain [48]. This expansion of sedaDNA into environmental palaeogenomics, together with the integration of sedaDNA and traditional palaeogenomic data derived from body fossils [55], will open up new approaches to understanding past biodiversity changes that are inaccessible with other palaeoecological proxies.…”
Section: Sedimentary Ancient Dna Adds Another Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sediments are also an important source of ancient DNA (aDNA) ( 2 , 3 ), allowing the molecular detection of ancient flora and fauna. Automated sample preparation ( 4 ) and the application of methods for targeted DNA retrieval ( 4 , 5 ) have enabled studies of Pleistocene sediment DNA to move beyond the recovery of DNA from species that were well represented in the fossil record of the sites studied, such as mammoth, horse, and bear ( 6 8 ), to taxa that were present in much smaller numbers, including hominins ( 4 , 5 , 9 , 10 ). This offers exciting new opportunities to investigate the geographical and temporal distribution of Pleistocene hominin groups where few or no skeletal elements are available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%