2022
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental filtering rather than dispersal limitation dominated plant community assembly in the Zoige Plateau

Abstract: Identifying the mechanisms that underlie the assembly of plant communities is critical to the conservation of terrestrial biodiversity. However, it is seldom measured or quantified how much deterministic versus stochastic processes contribute to community assembly in alpine meadows. Here, we measured the decay in community similarity with spatial and environmental distance in the Zoige Plateau. Furthermore, we used redundancy analysis (RDA) to divide the variations in the relative abundance of plant families i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the joint effect of space and environment (explained variance ranged from 34% to 58%) contributed mostly to root neighborhood β diversity. Similar results were found in subtropical (Shi et al, 2021) and tropical forests (Yang et al, 2015) and alpine meadow (Yang et al, 2022). Such a joint effect is typically interpreted as the influence of spatially structured environments on species turnover.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Generally, the joint effect of space and environment (explained variance ranged from 34% to 58%) contributed mostly to root neighborhood β diversity. Similar results were found in subtropical (Shi et al, 2021) and tropical forests (Yang et al, 2015) and alpine meadow (Yang et al, 2022). Such a joint effect is typically interpreted as the influence of spatially structured environments on species turnover.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Indeed, we found no correlation between genetic distance and geographic or ecological distance, so the nonrandom pattern of co‐variation between disturbance level and genetic variation in life history cannot be explained by local seed dispersal. We identify two other potential explanations: (i) specialized genotypes have adapted via the selection of new mutations affecting life history in an otherwise nonadapted lineage (Orr, 2005), or (ii) local environments filtered mis‐adapted genotypes out, in the same way that they exclude mis‐adapted species (Guo et al., 2018; Kraft et al., 2015; Laliberté et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2022). Since many alleles altering the genetics of flowering time have already been characterized in the western European region from which the populations originate (Le Corre, 2005; Lopez‐Arboleda et al., 2021), it is highly likely that genotypes with diverse regulatory alleles were among the pool of migrants that populated habitat patches in the city of Cologne.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, these characteristics reveal that A. thaliana habitats form a continuum of varying levels of humidity and nutrients, as well as varying frequencies of disturbance. Environmental variation is thought to help shape the diversity of plant communities by filtering out ill-suited species (Guo et al, 2018; Kraft et al, 2015; Laliberté et al, 2014; Yang et al, 2022). The ecological differences we quantified were clearly associated with the phenotypic differences displayed by plants in situ , as plants growing under better edaphic conditions (more nutrients, more water) were larger, and plants growing in disturbed habitats bolted later and bore more fruits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%