2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01829.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental filtering of dense-wooded species controls above-ground biomass stored in African moist forests

Abstract: Summary 1.Regional above-ground biomass estimates for tropical moist forests remain highly inaccurate mostly because they are based on extrapolations from a few plots scattered across a limited range of soils and other environmental conditions. When such conditions impact biomass, the estimation is biased. The effect of soil types on biomass has especially yielded controversial results. 2. We investigated the relationship between above-ground biomass and soil type in undisturbed moist forests in the Central Af… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
100
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
100
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The non-destructive sampling applied was based on the assumption that wood density does not vary significantly from pith to bark along the stem. Given that tree species studied were in the same edaphoclimatic conditions, the large differences observed between wood densities of the eighteen tree species could not be directly attributable to environmental conditions, but more to differences between species (Nogueira et al 2007;Gourlet-Fleury et al 2011). These differences could be explained by the intrinsic characteristics of species (Chave et al 2006;Zanne et al 2010;Zeidler, 2012).…”
Section: Basic Wood Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-destructive sampling applied was based on the assumption that wood density does not vary significantly from pith to bark along the stem. Given that tree species studied were in the same edaphoclimatic conditions, the large differences observed between wood densities of the eighteen tree species could not be directly attributable to environmental conditions, but more to differences between species (Nogueira et al 2007;Gourlet-Fleury et al 2011). These differences could be explained by the intrinsic characteristics of species (Chave et al 2006;Zanne et al 2010;Zeidler, 2012).…”
Section: Basic Wood Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slow regeneration of tropical forests on soils of poor quality is a wellknown general issue (Finegan 1996, Crk et al 2009). However, this has only recently arisen as a concern in the Congo Basin (Gourlet-Fleury et al 2011) where it has not yet been taken into account in forest management practices (N. Bayol personal communication). Large parts of the southern CAR and the northern Republic of Congo are characterized by ''Carnot'' sandstone, producing resource-poor soils associated with dense, slow-growing forest types (Fayolle et al 2012; Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geological types were characterized analogous to Gourlet-Fleury et al (2011). Sandstone and ironstone-capped plateaux and terraces provide a base for nutrient-poor substrates, and alluviums for intermediate substrates.…”
Section: Environmental and Human Infrastructure Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another solution would be sampling along gradients where allometric variation is known, e.g., altitudinal gradients having strong influence on soil types, climate, vegetation forms, and biomass (Girardin et al 2010). Soil physical conditions influence the floristic composition (Infante Mata et al 2011) and constrain the amount of biomass stored in tropical forests, highlighting the need to consider the importance of taking into account soil characteristics and species wood density when assessing national forest biomass (Gourlet-Fleury et al 2011). Unless for homogenous ecosystems, such as plantations or mangroves, it is not easy to take into consideration the floristic composition in the sampling scheme for the tropics because the number of tree species can be up to 300 per hectare (Gibbs et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%