Environmental filtering drives biodiversity–spatial stability relationships in a large temperate forest region

Abstract

The assumption that greater biodiversity enhances ecosystem stability, commonly known as ‘portfolio effect’, has attracted considerable research attention. However, the potential portfolio effects on spatial stability (the similarity of ecosystem functioning among forest communities) are still poorly examined especially at different spatial scales and under varying environmental stress conditions. Accordingly, this study investigates the biodiversity–spatial stability relationship among regional communities across different spatial scales and environmental conditions in a temperate forest region. We define spatial stability as the invariability of the productivity of woody plants among plots within a regional community. To test spatial stability, the N closest plots to a given plot were aggregated to form regional communities representing different spatial scales. Structural equation modelling was used to evaluate how biodiversity (including taxonomic [TD] and phylogenetic diversity [PD]) increases spatial stability via species asynchrony and/or population stability across spatial scales. Hierarchical Bayesian modelling was used to evaluate the environmental dependence of the portfolio effects on spatial stability. TD and PD both increased the spatial stability by increasing asynchrony, but decreased population stability. The portfolio effect of TD on spatial stability became stronger and reached saturation at the intermediate scale and then decreased as regional communities became larger. The portfolio effects of TD were weaker under the stressful conditions of drought, high precipitation seasonality and high elevation but unchanged across temperature seasonality and human disturbance. PD showed no discernable effect on spatial stability and did not change across spatial scale and environmental condition. Our results suggest that the positive effect of biodiversity on species asynchrony overcomes the negative biodiversity effect on population stability to buffer the spatial change in productivity in diverse communities. Future research of the biodiversity–spatial stability relationship may thus benefit from incorporating different spatial scales and environmental conditions into the analysis. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Chronic anthropogenic disturbance mediates the biodiversity‐productivity relationship across stand ages in a large temperate forest region

“…As a gap expands allowing for species regeneration, the habitat within the gap undergoes notable transformations, including soil compaction, an increase in runoff water, and a depletion of litter and nutrients (Singh, 1998;Singh et al, 1997). Thus, chronic disturbance drives up the level of resource competition among the remaining plant species as soil nutrients and water become increasingly scarce (Lin, Qiao, et al, 2023;Singh, 1998;Singh et al, 1997). When competition increases, a few dominant species might monopolise resources, thereby limiting the overall contribution of diverse species to ecosystem productivity, and thus diminishing the positive effects of biodiversity on productivity.…”