2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental factors influencing the management of key accounts in an Arab Middle Eastern context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the context has a strong influence on SAM implementation and this practice may be seen and applied differently in different companies, industries, and countries (ALHussan et al, 2014). Acknowledging these limitations, the present paper offers fresh insight on SAM implementation and functioning from contexts in which SAM is relatively under researched.…”
Section: Insert Tablementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because the context has a strong influence on SAM implementation and this practice may be seen and applied differently in different companies, industries, and countries (ALHussan et al, 2014). Acknowledging these limitations, the present paper offers fresh insight on SAM implementation and functioning from contexts in which SAM is relatively under researched.…”
Section: Insert Tablementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Ojasalo (2001) proposed that SAM implementation and functioning consists of four basic elements: (1) identifying the key accounts through a number segmentation variables -criticality, quantity, replaceability, slack, (2) analyzing the account on levels such as basic characteristics, relationship history, the level commitment to the relationship, goal congruence of the parties, and switching costs, (3) selecting suitable strategies based on the power positions of the seller and the account, and finally, (4) continuously developing and customizing operational-level capabilities to enhance the relationship on levels such as products & services, organizational structure, information exchange, and personnel allocated to the account. ALHussan et al (2014), in turn, identified a number of environmental-specific factors that are likely to affect SAM implementation, including the intensity of competition and ownership structure; product and customer complexity; Western influences (education, training, experience, expatriation); and institutional and cultural influences. Abratt and Kelly (2002) shed light on a different set of factors including knowledge and understanding of the key account customer's business; proper implementation and understanding of the SAM program; commitment to the SAM program; suitability of the key account manager; and the level of trust between supplier and customer.…”
Section: Insert Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we predicted that customer satisfaction (H3), rewarding CRM usage (H6), managing changes in CRM projects (H7) and sharing customer knowledge (H9) should positively influence employee perceptions of CRM, the findings of this study do not support these hypotheses. These results might be explained by the economic development, market conditions, and cultural values of the Arab world; these differences impact a variety of managerial practices and customer orientation activities, including metrics to track customer satisfaction, buyer-seller interactions, and the ways customer relationships start and develop (Ramesham et al 2006;ALHussan, AL-Husan, and Chavi 2014). Moreover, the typical hierarchal management structures alongside the weak institutional structures in the Arab world made it difficult for organisations to develop a viable customer-centric orientation.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Employee Perceptions Of Crmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the relationship papers (24 articles) represent content addressing the relationship aspects such as; quality, satisfaction, value, trust, commitment etc. (Filiatrault and Lapierre, 1997;Patterson, 2000;Mittal, 2010;Bennett et al 2004;Money, 2004;Lapierre et al 1999;Gounaris, 2005;Molinari et al 2008;Rapp et al 2008;Theron et al 2008;Stan et al 2007;Chumpitaz et al 2007;Durvasula et al 2002;Peterson et al 2005;Doney et al 2007;Parry et al 2012;Ryals and Humphries, 2007;Mencarelli and Riviere, 2014;ALHussan et al 2014;Kelly and Scott, 2012;Bolton et al 2003;Keiningham et al 2003;Vosgerau et al 2008;Eid et al 2006;Johnson et al 2001), 6-7 studies addressed the network (Gummesson and Polese, 2009;Covelio and Brodie, 2001;Covelio et al 2002;Wilkinson, 2006;Jones et al 2013;Moliner-Velazquez et al 2014), and 6 addressed buyer-seller relationship (Barry et al 2008;Homburg and Garbe, 1999;Edvardsson et al 2008;Viio and Gronroos, 2014;Edvardsson et al 2014;Lambert and Enz, 2012). The remaining studies are related with relationship quality (Palmatier, 2008;Boles et al 2000;…”
Section: Thematic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%