2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental expenditure spillovers: Evidence from an estimated multi-area DSGE model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the author considers important the inclusion of local government spending in a RBC model that seeks out to reflect the behavior of any sub-national economy. In contrast with Yang (2009), Pan et al (2020) find that environmental spending generates a significant negative impact on consumption, investment and capital stock. This negative influence on consumption and investment is more evident during the first years of the period studied.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the author considers important the inclusion of local government spending in a RBC model that seeks out to reflect the behavior of any sub-national economy. In contrast with Yang (2009), Pan et al (2020) find that environmental spending generates a significant negative impact on consumption, investment and capital stock. This negative influence on consumption and investment is more evident during the first years of the period studied.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The novelty of this work in relation to the standard model is the introduction of public spending in the RBC model and its extrapolation to a specific region of China. Pan et al (2020) build a neo-Keynesian DSGE model with a simultaneous spatial equation. This model incorporates nominal rigidities, indirect effects of environmental spending and a broad set of shocks.…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of green fiscal policies, the primary emphasis is still placed on examining the economic and environmental impacts of overall environmental spending, emission reduction subsidies, and pollution prevention and control expenditures. Pan et al [23] previously examined the spatial effects of local government environmental expenditures and found that local government environmental expenditures displaced local consumption and investment but had a positive impact on the economic growth of other regions. Meanwhile, Wu [24] discovered that the effects of emissions reduction subsidies on economic growth manifested as short-term promotion and long-term inhibition, whereas the opposite was true for impacts on environmental quality.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been extensive research into the economic effects of environmental policies, although the majority of these studies have focused on traditional environmental regulation policies and green finance policies, with less research conducted on green fiscal policies. Although some studies have used the DSGE model to analyze the economic and environmental consequences of green fiscal policies [23][24][25], they have been primarily focused on the spatial implications of policies and their impact on environmental quality. Additionally, considering that most of these studies include businesses' emission reduction efforts as exogenous factors, it is difficult to gain insights into the internal processes of policies working on economic and environmental variables, and there have been no strong conclusions obtained regarding this.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore government expenditure policies may have a material indirect effect on the economy. Such an effect should be taken into account in the assessment of the policy effectiveness and its impact on the total benefits gained by the society (Pan, X. et al, 2020).…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%