2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental enrichment in female rodents: Considerations in the effects on behavior and biochemical markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of female animals housed in EE, there have been inconsistencies on both the behavioral and neurochemical/hormonal outcomes reported (see Girbovan and Plamondon, 2013) and the benefits of this condition to females is underexplored. Like others, our females were unable to complete the object-in-place test (Howland et al, 2012) and we had hypothesized that the EE experience would improve spatial discrimination on this task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In terms of female animals housed in EE, there have been inconsistencies on both the behavioral and neurochemical/hormonal outcomes reported (see Girbovan and Plamondon, 2013) and the benefits of this condition to females is underexplored. Like others, our females were unable to complete the object-in-place test (Howland et al, 2012) and we had hypothesized that the EE experience would improve spatial discrimination on this task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The use of female mice reduced the number of animals sacrificed without being used for scientific projects. Although male EEs are more common, numerous EE studies have been done with females [9,17,43]. Due to the large sample size taken randomly throughout the housing period, any possible effect of the estrous cycle should be canceled out.…”
Section: Animals and Housingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies could also investigate whether factors that have previously been shown to impact upon the performance of male rats in cognitive bias tasks, such as stress exposure and changes in housing conditions (e.g., Brydges et al, 2011;Burman et al, 2008;Rygula et al, 2013), have similar, or different, effects in female rats. Female rats, for example, are thought to be less stressed than males when group-housed (Girbovan and Plamondon, 2013), and cognitive bias tasks might provide both a test of this hypothesis and, more broadly, provide a useful measure of affective state for revealing sex differences in animal welfare requirements. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sex differences in cognitive bias are relevant to animal welfare, as effects of enrichment regimes and protocols can differ between female and male animals (Girbovan and Plamondon, 2013). Determining the link between affective state and cognition in rats could also increase our understanding of sex differences in cognitive bias and susceptibility to affective disorders in human beings (Gluck et al, 2014;Hales et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%