2019
DOI: 10.1017/age.2018.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Efficiency of Apple Production in China: A Translog Stochastic Frontier Analysis

Abstract: This article estimates technical and environmental efficiencies using the stochastic frontier analysis with panel data of twenty-two main apple production provinces in China during 1992–2014. Results show that the environmental efficiency for pesticide input alone has lower mean value of 0.337 than environmental efficiency for the two environmentally detrimental inputs, pesticide and chemical fertilizer, which is 0.782. Furthermore, all efficiency scores have decreasing trends over time. Loess Plateau is more … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Econometrically, the translog production function is specified as follows:Oi=θ0+false∑m=16θ1ln(Iitalicim)+0.5m=16θ2ln(Iitalicim)2+false∑m=16k=16θ3lnfalse(Iimfalse)lnfalse(Iikfalse)+εiwhere ln( O i )is the logarithm of the banana yield for farmer i ; ln( I im ) is the logarithm of m input for farmer i ; and ln( I im ) 2 is its squared term; ln( I im ) ln( I ik ) captures the interaction between inputs m and k , mk. The inputs include land, seedlings, fertilisers, pesticides, labour and other inputs (e.g., irrigation and machinery), following the relevant literature (Bai et al, 2019; Ma, Renwick, et al, 2018; Villano et al, 2015; Zheng et al, 2021). Because some farmers in our sample did not purchase seedlings and other inputs in the 2019 survey year, the two input variables have zero‐value observations.…”
Section: Estimation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Econometrically, the translog production function is specified as follows:Oi=θ0+false∑m=16θ1ln(Iitalicim)+0.5m=16θ2ln(Iitalicim)2+false∑m=16k=16θ3lnfalse(Iimfalse)lnfalse(Iikfalse)+εiwhere ln( O i )is the logarithm of the banana yield for farmer i ; ln( I im ) is the logarithm of m input for farmer i ; and ln( I im ) 2 is its squared term; ln( I im ) ln( I ik ) captures the interaction between inputs m and k , mk. The inputs include land, seedlings, fertilisers, pesticides, labour and other inputs (e.g., irrigation and machinery), following the relevant literature (Bai et al, 2019; Ma, Renwick, et al, 2018; Villano et al, 2015; Zheng et al, 2021). Because some farmers in our sample did not purchase seedlings and other inputs in the 2019 survey year, the two input variables have zero‐value observations.…”
Section: Estimation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Previous research has important theoretical value for guiding the development of China's grain production, but most scholars have not considered the impact of environmental factors on the efficiency of grain production. In recent years, although a few scholars have taken environmental factors into consideration when studying the efficiency of grain production, they only considered undesired output (such as chemical oxygen demand, total nitrogen and total phosphorus) without attaching importance to carbon sink output resulted from the positive externalities of grain production (Bai et al, 2019). However, ignoring the environmental factors of grain production (especially grain carbon sinks) will be detrimental to the accuracy of grain production efficiency assessment.…”
Section: Space Effects Of Grain Production Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The translog production frontier model, following Tipi, Dari, and Vural (2021) and Bai, Salim, and Bloch (2019) is expressed as follows:…”
Section: Technical Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%