2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental effects on the mechanical properties of glass-fiber epoxy composite tubular specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
95
1
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
95
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This in turn may have led to dissolving and leaching of these elements from the glass fiber. These results support the observation by Ellyin and Maser that in hot water environment leaching could occur at the fiber/matrix interface [10].…”
Section: Conditioning and Water Absorptionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This in turn may have led to dissolving and leaching of these elements from the glass fiber. These results support the observation by Ellyin and Maser that in hot water environment leaching could occur at the fiber/matrix interface [10].…”
Section: Conditioning and Water Absorptionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A number of researchers have investigated the effect of moisture and temperature on glass/epoxy composites [6][7][8][9][10]. Absorption of distilled water and seawater in glass/epoxy composites has been noticed to cause changes in the thermophysical, mechanical, and chemical characteristics of the epoxy matrix by plasticization and hydrolysis [6,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is contrary to expectation, as composites with fiber reinforcement, whether treated or untreated, should exhibit higher water absorption due to the inherent hydrophilic nature of the filler [22] [30] [37]- [41]. However, water absorption depends on several factors, namely the type of fiber, its loading and orientation, area of exposed surface, interfacial adhesion, voids, and surface protection [41] [42]. Sample (T20 600) and the U25 300 CONTROL T20 600 U20 600 T20 300 Hardness Shore Scare D Samples control sample have more voids in them as compared to other samples and this explains the high initial rate of water absorption [43], until all the available spaces in the composite are taken over by the water.…”
Section: Mechanical Property Testcontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…WU depended on various parameters, including the type of fiber, its loading and orientation, area of the exposed surface, interfacial adhesion, voids, and surface protection. 26 We observed from the graph that the hydrophobic polymer matrix, RPP, absorbed a constant amount of water (0.2%) throughout the period of 150 days, whereas the EFBfiber-based composite, NFC, absorbed the highest amount (8.4%) of water during the same period of immersion. The GFbased composite, GFC, showed a WU value of 0.35%.…”
Section: Thermal Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 92%