2006
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2006.864387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental effects on the interferometric repeat-pass coherence of forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PALSAR FBD data also displayed a weak correlation (n=71, R=-0.36, p=0.002) between precipitation differences and HH coherence for the potato crop cover. It can be seen from [49] and Drezet and Quegan [50].…”
Section: Meteorological Effects On the Temporal Decorrelationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The PALSAR FBD data also displayed a weak correlation (n=71, R=-0.36, p=0.002) between precipitation differences and HH coherence for the potato crop cover. It can be seen from [49] and Drezet and Quegan [50].…”
Section: Meteorological Effects On the Temporal Decorrelationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(Wagner et al, 2003) used tandem coherence and an exponential model in combination with JERS-1 backscatter to determine stem volume in Siberia. In (Drezet et al, 2006;Drezet, 2007) a set of coherence images over UK with a good coherence range was used. Instead of biomass or stem volume, age was used as variable, and results cannot be compared.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variations are strongly influenced by meteorological effects, which are difficult to adjust for a priori to produce quantitative estimates. Analysis of the causes of environmental effects can be found in Way et al (1991); Proisy et al (2000); Fransson et al (2002); Drezet and Quegan (2006).…”
Section: Remote Sensing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%