Plastics and the Environment 2003
DOI: 10.1002/0471721557.ch8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Effects on Polymeric Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most polymers are sensitive to UV radiation in the wavelength region between 300 and 360 nm [257]. Individual polymers absorb and are degraded by UV within a much narrower region, often referred to as their activation spectra maxima [257]. For aromatic PUs, the activation spectra maxima vary between 350-415 nm [257].…”
Section: Uv Absorbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most polymers are sensitive to UV radiation in the wavelength region between 300 and 360 nm [257]. Individual polymers absorb and are degraded by UV within a much narrower region, often referred to as their activation spectra maxima [257]. For aromatic PUs, the activation spectra maxima vary between 350-415 nm [257].…”
Section: Uv Absorbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mimic the life cycle of mulches [38], the nonwovens were exposed first to simulated laboratory weathering (reviewed in [39]), following the ASTM standard G155 [40], to assess the effect of photodegradation, photooxidation and abiotic hydrolysis, and then subjected to biodegradation via ASTM D5338 [41]. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the biodegradation of fully biobased mulches after exposure weathering under controlled conditions has not been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These processes do not exactly match environmental conditions, and the acceleration of the degradation processes by various manipulations in order for experiments to be concluded timely means that determinations of when reactions occur under ambient conditions are often inexactly estimated (Tonjes and Greene, 2013). The closer experiments mimic environmental conditions, the better the likelihood of timing degradation effects correctly (Searle, 2003), although careful bench-scale tests in at least one instance considerably over predicted degradation measured in fi eld experiments (Tonjes and Greene, 2013). Laboratory results can lead to incorrect descriptions of degradation potentials, or widely varying estimates of environmental persistence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%