Environmental economics of lignin derived transport fuels

Abstract

This paper explores the environmental and economic aspects of fast pyrolytic conversion of lignin, obtained from 2G ethanol plants, to transport fuels for both the marine and automotive markets. Various scenarios are explored, pertaining to aggregation of lignin from several sites, alternative energy carries to replace lignin, transport modalities, and allocation methodology. The results highlight two critical factors that ultimately determine the economic and/or environmental fuel viability. The first factor, the logistics scheme, exhibited the disadvantage of the centralized approach, owing to prohibitively expensive transportation costs of the low energy-dense lignin. Life cycle analysis (LCA) displayed the second critical factor related to alternative energy carrier selection. Natural gas (NG) chosen over additional biomass boosts well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions (WTW GHG) to a level incompatible with the reduction targets set by the U.S. renewable fuel standard (RFS). Adversely, the process' economics revealed higher profits vs. fossil energy carrier.

Lignin biopolymer: the material of choice for advanced lithium-based batteries

“…Lignin is a phenolic biopolymer that is produced in larger quantity of $50 000 000 tons each year, and due to its aromatic and inhomogeneous complex chemical structure, it is habitually used for combustion of pulps and paper industry boilers. [16][17][18][19] Traditionally, 15-33 wt% of lignin contents are present in any biomass; 20,21 Table 1 shows the percentage of lignin in basic wood types. Usually, lignin is based on three aromatic alcohols, sinapyl, coniferyl, and p-coumaryl, as shown in Fig.…”

A Perspective on Biofuels Use and CCS for GHG Mitigation in the Marine Sector

“…The marine sector is conceivably more favorable in this regard than the road and aviation sectors, as marine engines are more tolerant of lower-quality fuel. For example, it has been proposed that unprocessed lignin pyrolysis oil can substitute low-sulfur marine gas oil ( Obydenkova et al., 2017 ). However, it has also been shown that crude bio-oil cannot be blended with current marine fuels in any proportion such that the resultant mixture meets marine fuel specifications ( Chong and Bridgwater, 2017 ).…”

Methods for designing and assessing biorefineries: Review

“…A very comprehensive paper covering this analysis for second‐generation feedstock is reported by Obydenkova et al . ) Currently, Beta Renewables (the Crescentino Bioethanol Plant) is not a real biorefinery under current definitions. Nevertheless, this case is considered because this plant can upgrade to a biorefinery, for example by using the residues of the process as a raw material for the generation of other added‐value products.…”