2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental DNA of insects and springtails from caves reveals complex processes of eDNA transfer in soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(130 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, other associations in direct contact with the soil have been detected and studied ( Table 1 ) [ 56 ]. These pioneering investigations are well-defined and could not be possible to explore without the introduction of eDNA metabarcoding [ 57 ]. Conventional techniques for studying biodiversity help assess and recognize the threats to global ecosystems, with rapidly evolving innovative techniques like eDNA providing novel prospects for all-encompassing biodiversity research besides proving to be a proficient and cost-effective method for evaluating the ecosystem structure and functioning [ 58 , 59 ].…”
Section: Exertion Of Environmental Dna In Terrestrial Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, other associations in direct contact with the soil have been detected and studied ( Table 1 ) [ 56 ]. These pioneering investigations are well-defined and could not be possible to explore without the introduction of eDNA metabarcoding [ 57 ]. Conventional techniques for studying biodiversity help assess and recognize the threats to global ecosystems, with rapidly evolving innovative techniques like eDNA providing novel prospects for all-encompassing biodiversity research besides proving to be a proficient and cost-effective method for evaluating the ecosystem structure and functioning [ 58 , 59 ].…”
Section: Exertion Of Environmental Dna In Terrestrial Ecosystemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our opinion, however, the most likely explanation for most of them is that these organisms (or part of them) were transported through the soil and into the groundwater during rain events. This theory is also mentioned by Lunghi et al (2022) as an explanation for the presence of freshwater macroinvertebrates' DNA in cave soil. This is also congruent with the fact that other groundwater eDNA studies systematically found DNA from surface organisms in their samples (Oberprieler et al, 2021;West et al, 2020).…”
Section: Summentioning
confidence: 86%
“…If the proportion of each of these groups identified in Table 1 is representative of the whole data set, it is likely that most of our ASVs are actually associated with stygoxene and non-aquatic taxa, possibly washed in from surface/soil ecosystems. However, a tight coupling of above-and below-ground ecosystems is expected, and groundwater signals should integrate all these communities, as demonstrated by Lunghi et al (2022). The differences observed related to land-use could be attributed to soil micro-organisms, but since all strata (i.e.…”
Section: Diversity Present In Groundwater Edna Reflects Land-use and ...mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Dedicated surveys for Troglodiplura are recommended to better elucidate the distribution of species, to detect new species, identify which are likely to be at threat and the conservation actions needed to protect them. Collection and analysis of eDNA from cave sediment has been shown to be successful in detecting arthropods in cave environs [ 86 ] and provides increased opportunity to detect these species. Additionally, the use of passive surveillance, such as camera traps, has been documented as a successful method for monitoring populations of mygalomorph spiders and for collecting ecological and behavioural data [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%