“…While the environmental DNA shed from an organism is now widely used for species detection in a wide variety of contexts (Barnes & Turner, 2016;Jerde, Mahon, Chadderton, & Lodge, 2011;Laramie, Pilliod, & Goldberg, 2015;Mächler, Deiner, Steinmann, & Altermatt, 2014;Rees, Maddison, Middleditch, Patmore, & Gough, 2014;Takahara, Minamoto, Yamanaka, Doi, & Kawabata, 2012), mobilizing environmental DNA for management requires estimation of population size and trends in addition to assessing presence or absence. Recent research suggests that eDNA quantified with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or digital-droplet PCR can provide a proxy for actual abundance in controlled experiments (Rees et al, 2014), in ponds (Lacoursière-Roussel, Côté, Leclerc, & Bernatchez, 2016;Takahara et al, 2012) in streams (Doi et al, 2015;Levi et al, 2019;Lodge et al, 2012;Tillotson et al, 2018;Wilcox et al, 2016) and in marine bays (Plough et al, 2018). However, the efficacy of environmental DNA based indices of abundance in natural settings have produced mixed results (Yates, Fraser, & Derry, 2019) and have not yet been assessed in a management context for long-term population monitoring.…”