Environmental disclosure and sentiment analysis: state of the art and opportunities for public-sector organisations

Abstract

Purpose Because of the expansion of the internet and Web 2.0 phenomenon, new challenges are emerging in the disclosure practises adopted by organisations in the public-sector. This study aims to examine local governments’ (LGOs) use of social media (SM) in disclosing environmental actions/plans/information as a new way to improve accountability to citizens to obtain organisational legitimacy and the related sentiment of citizens’ judgements. Design/methodology/approach This paper analyses the content of 39 Italian LGOs’ public pages on Facebook. After the distinction between five classes of environmental issues (air, water, energy, waste and territory), an initial study is performed to detect possible sub-topics applying latent Dirichlet allocation. Having a list of posts related to specific environmental themes, the researchers computed the sentiment of citizens’ comments. To measure sentiment, two different approaches were implemented: one based on a lexicon dictionary and the other based on convolutional neural networks. Findings Facebook is used by LGOs to disclose environmental issues, focussing on their main interest in obtaining organisational legitimacy, and the analysis shows an increasing impact of Web 2.0 in the direct interaction of LGOs with citizens. On the other hand, there is a clear divergence of interest on environmental topics between LGOs and citizens in a dialogic accountability framework. Practical implications Sentiment analysis (SA) could be used by politicians, but also by managers/entrepreneurs in the business sector, to analyse stakeholders’ judgements of their communications/actions and plans on corporate social responsibility. This tool gives a result on time (i.e. not months or years after, as for the reporting system). It is cheaper than a survey and allows a first “photograph” of stakeholders’ sentiment. It can also be a useful tool for supporting, developing and improving environmental reporting. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is one of the first to apply SA to environmental disclosure via SM in the public sphere. The study links modern techniques in natural language processing and machine learning with the important aspects of environmental communication between LGOs and citizens.

Corporate social responsibility actions and organizational legitimacy at the peak of COVID-19: a sentiment analysis

“…Crises can upset companies' consolidated relationships with society and redefine their expectations. In this respect, this paper indicates that the SA of general public reactions to CSR actions can be a useful managerial tool for leaders within the public sphere (Hartley, 2018), in making more informed strategic decisions (Barbeito-Caamañ o and Chalmeta, 2020; Giacomini et al, 2020;Rocca et al, 2020).…”

Organisational and professional challenges amid the evolution of sustainability reporting: a theoretical framework and an agenda for future research

“…The paper by Laura Rocca, Davide Giacomini and Paola Zola (Rocca et al , 2021) examines and assesses local governments’ use of social media in disclosing environmental actions, plans and information as a new opportunity to improve accountability to citizens. This approach should allow local governments to obtain organisational legitimacy and the related sentiment of citizens’ judgement.…”

Stakeholder interactions as sources for organisational learning: insights from the water sector

“…Water management has been privatised and outsourced in many countries. There is constant debate between public and private ownership, and regulators have often seen privatisation as a viable solution to promote efficiency despite controversial empirical evidence (Bel, 2020; Homsy and Warner, 2020; Warner, 2021; González-Gómez et al , 2013; Romano et al , 2013). Since the 1990s, the Italian water sector has been subject to political reforms, and in June 2011, the outcome of a referendum confirmed a preference for public ownership of the water service.…”

“…Web 2.0 has greatly expanded useful means for developing strategies for stakeholder engagement. Nonetheless, the most popular practices still seem far from what Mouffe (2000) defined as agonistic pluralism where a "pluralistic arena is created where the stakeholder engagement is the collection of various standpoints that public sector organisations have to take into account in their plans in an agonism -not antagonism-perspective" (Rocca et al, 2020).…”