2012
DOI: 10.1002/csr.1281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Disclosure and Financial Characteristics of the Firm: The Case of Denmark

Abstract: Drawing on the importance of social accounting for sustainable development, we study practices of environmental disclosure on the websites of companies listed on the Copenhagen Stock Exchange. The first part of this paper produces and discusses descriptive evidence on environmental reporting practices by listed companies with respect to the content of disclosed information. We then undertake an explanatory task in order to identify the factors that determine environmental reporting for firms listed on the Cope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
149
3
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
18
149
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…see Sweeney and Coughlan, 2008;Holder-Webb et al, 2009;Morhardt, 2010), our assessment further confirms noticeable variation across sectors regarding their propensity to disclose non-financial information. More comprehensive environmental disclosures by industrial firms have been also identified in the recent studies of Liu and Anbumozhi (2009), da Silva Monteiro and Aibar-Guzmán (2010) Andrikopoulos and Kriklani (2012). Likewise, evidence from other national business systems, e.g.…”
Section: Discussion -Managerial Relevancementioning
confidence: 69%
“…see Sweeney and Coughlan, 2008;Holder-Webb et al, 2009;Morhardt, 2010), our assessment further confirms noticeable variation across sectors regarding their propensity to disclose non-financial information. More comprehensive environmental disclosures by industrial firms have been also identified in the recent studies of Liu and Anbumozhi (2009), da Silva Monteiro and Aibar-Guzmán (2010) Andrikopoulos and Kriklani (2012). Likewise, evidence from other national business systems, e.g.…”
Section: Discussion -Managerial Relevancementioning
confidence: 69%
“…The majority of the research showed a positive relation between the two variables such as the research conducted by (Hartikayanti et al, 2016), (Andrikopoulos & Kriklani, 2013), (Michelon & Parbonetti, 2012) and (Montero et al, 2011). The main reason behind this positive relation is the idea of how visible the firm is to the society, so the larger the firm is, the more visible it becomes and therefore it is obligated to disclose more information (Patten, 2002) and (Cormier & Gordon, 2001).…”
Section: Firm Size and Environmental Information Disclosurementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, the firm's size as a control variable seems to affect the dissemination level of information in terms of CDLI consistent to Luo and Tang (2014), Andrikopoulos and Kriklani (2013) and Clarkson et al (2008). A number of potential explanations have been phrased in the existing literature, including avoidance of the social scrutiny or maintaining company's legitimacy in the eyes of society (Branco, Rodrigues 2008;Meng et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%