2017
DOI: 10.1128/aem.01147-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Determinants of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the Chesapeake Bay

Abstract: naturally-occurs in brackish and marine waters and is one of the leading causes of seafood-borne illness. Previous work studying the ecology of is often limited in geographic extent and lacking a full range of environmental measures. This study used a unique, large dataset of surface water samples in the Chesapeake Bay (=1,385) collected from 148 monitoring stations from 2007 to 2010. Water was analyzed for over 20 environmental parameters with additional meteorological and surrounding land use data. -specific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
58
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(54 reference statements)
10
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when real time PCR was performed on the same samples collected by Parveen et al (2008) , detection of tdh and trh positive V. parahaemolyticus increased to 20 and 40%, respectively, for oyster samples and 13 and 40% for water samples. Conversely, in a study performed by Davis et al (2017) , water samples collected from the Chesapeake Bay between 2007 and 2010, were all negative for both trh and tdh during the course of the whole study. Ultimately, the ability to detect pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus is greatly impacted by sample processing techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, when real time PCR was performed on the same samples collected by Parveen et al (2008) , detection of tdh and trh positive V. parahaemolyticus increased to 20 and 40%, respectively, for oyster samples and 13 and 40% for water samples. Conversely, in a study performed by Davis et al (2017) , water samples collected from the Chesapeake Bay between 2007 and 2010, were all negative for both trh and tdh during the course of the whole study. Ultimately, the ability to detect pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus is greatly impacted by sample processing techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The results of this study suggest that the single-band O-2012 algorithm is a valuable tool for estimating TSS via remote sensing in the Chesapeake Bay for general environmental applications. However, for applications where more accuracy or precision in waters with higher TSS concentrations may be needed, such as when modeling Vibrio bacteria [3], a statistical or machine learning model that utilizes additional MODIS bands could prove valuable. In estuarine systems, additional MODIS bands could provide information about suspended particles other than sediment that contribute to a TSS measurement, such as phytoplankton and detrital matter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suspended solids in a water column reduce light and other radiation availability for phytoplankton and submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) growth, while increased sedimentation rates reduce benthic organism habitability. It has also been shown that the volume of suspended particles in water may have biological importance for predicting incidence and abundance of pathogenic bacteria like Vibrio parahaemolyticus [1][2][3]. Forms of suspended particles that contribute to TSS concentrations include sediment, detrital matter, and microorganisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advancement over conventional PCR, known as real‐time PCR, allows the detection of V. parahaemolyticus in samples in real time (Davis et al., 2017; Paranjpye et al., 2015). This method is also often referred to as quantitative PCR (qPCR).…”
Section: Distribution Of V Parahaemolyticus In Oystersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method allows fast, accurate, and consistent detection of specific genes simultaneously in large numbers of samples. Real‐time PCR does not require post‐PCR steps, and results are expressed as a number of genome equivalents or copies per unit volume or weight samples (Davis et al., 2017; Paranjpye et al., 2015). Several studies have successfully used multiplex real‐time PCR using primers that target multiple species‐specific genes for detecting and enumerating total and pathogenic V. parahaemolyticus in oyster samples, including Kim, Lee, Kim, Kwon, and Kwon (2008), Nordstrom, Vickery, Blackstone, Murray, and DePaola (2007), Panicker, Call, Krug, and Bej (2004), Xu, Ji, Wu, Yan, and Chen (2018), and Blackstone et al.…”
Section: Distribution Of V Parahaemolyticus In Oystersmentioning
confidence: 99%