1974
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1974.tb00597.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS OF THE VOLGA‐KAMA CASCADE OF POWER STATIONS1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been a particularly serious problem along the Volga and Kama rivers, where over 25,000 km ~ have been or will shortly be inundated. Recent years have seen a growing consensus among Soviet water management experts that much of this land loss may not have been justified and that this practice should be avoided in the future (Micklin 1974). Consequently, sentiment is strong that large plains reservoirs be avoided in connection with interbasin water transfers because they would eliminate from use the most valuable agricultural land in river floodplains and also aggravate the already serious problem of widespread inadequate drainage in northern areas (Siberskoye otdeleniye 1975, Lvovich 1977.…”
Section: Environmental Constraints On Interbasin Transfersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This has been a particularly serious problem along the Volga and Kama rivers, where over 25,000 km ~ have been or will shortly be inundated. Recent years have seen a growing consensus among Soviet water management experts that much of this land loss may not have been justified and that this practice should be avoided in the future (Micklin 1974). Consequently, sentiment is strong that large plains reservoirs be avoided in connection with interbasin water transfers because they would eliminate from use the most valuable agricultural land in river floodplains and also aggravate the already serious problem of widespread inadequate drainage in northern areas (Siberskoye otdeleniye 1975, Lvovich 1977.…”
Section: Environmental Constraints On Interbasin Transfersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Cascades (chains) of large dams along some rivers have severely reduced and in some cases nearly destroyed fish runs (e.g., salmon, whitefish, sturgeon). Two of the world's most affected rivers are the Columbia in the Northwestern United States and the Volga in European Russia (Muckleston 1977;Netboy 1986;Micklin 1974;Vendrov 1977). Large reservoirs directly diminish downstream flow, chiefly through evaporative losses from their surfaces but also, under the right conditions, from leakage through their banks and bottoms This is a serious problem in arid regions (e.g., Central Asia and the Southwestern US) where huge reservoirs have been created in the deserts which have high evaporation rates (one to 2½ meters annually) and deep water tables (Van der Leeden 1990, 94-97).…”
Section: Riversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reservoirs of the Volga-Kama cascade are one of the largest cascades in the world, totaling 11 reservoirs ( Figure 1, Table 1). The main purpose of the dams was to produce electricity; before the 1930s, the Volga was used only for transport and fishing [24,25]. As shown in Table 1, Kuibyshev reservoir has the largest surface and the highest number of types of uses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1. The main characteristics of reservoirs from the Volga-Kama cascade [24,25] (the numbers in the first column correspond to the reservoirs from Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%