2014
DOI: 10.1111/tsq.12048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Concern of Labor Union Members in the United States

Abstract: The labor and environmental movements have had a complicated relationship with periods of cooperation as well as conflict, but recently there has been increasing collaboration at the national level. Whether such a trend of cooperation can be sustained will partially depend on grassroots‐level connections between the two movements. However, there has been little empirical research on the environmental attitudes of union members, which is important for understanding the potential for shared values between union … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the face of declining employment, the union became more susceptible to job blackmail, and in 1977 opposed Amendments to the Clean Air Act. Economic pressures also influence rank-and-file members, who are more pro-environmental than the general public during times of economic prosperity, but not in weaker economic climates (Kojola, Xiao, and McCright 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the face of declining employment, the union became more susceptible to job blackmail, and in 1977 opposed Amendments to the Clean Air Act. Economic pressures also influence rank-and-file members, who are more pro-environmental than the general public during times of economic prosperity, but not in weaker economic climates (Kojola, Xiao, and McCright 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the face of declining employment, the union became more susceptible to job blackmail, and in 1977 opposed Amendments to the Clean Air Act. Economic pressures also influence rank‐and‐file members, who are more pro‐environmental than the general public during times of economic prosperity, but not in weaker economic climates (Kojola, Xiao, and McCright ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research could also consider the criminogenic factors theorized within broader trends such as urbanization (Kahn, ), union strength (Kojola, Xiao, and McCright, ), firm organization (Grant, Jones, and Bergesen, ), rates of production (Schnaiberg, ), and (de)industrialization (Rodwin and Sazanami, ). The presence of green crime havens could also reside in the fact that regulatory agencies serve both as advisor and enforcer in the administration of environmental law (Du Rées, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%