Environmental Communication as Nexus

Depoe, Stephen P.

doi:10.1080/17524030701395871

Cited by 14 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The grant application component focused on developing a local theory of the current population of Vrchári and on their new strategies of communication with the public. The applicants and partners are (Depoe, 2007;Cox, 2006Cox, , 2015 of continuity and discontinuity of the MSCS are gradually gaining general support.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cultural Transmission in Slovak Mountain Regions: Local Knowledge as Symbolic Argumentation

Murin

2022

Palgrave Studies in Anthropology of Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Anthropological findings and symbolic activities of native populations can be argumentative tools in environmental communication. This chapter presents the ethnography research and assistance of anthropologists in the re-adaptation of the new mountain generation in Vrchár communities in Slovakia, Central Europe. Here, in the second half of twentieth century, several generations were evicted from their original surroundings. The anthropologists compiled an inventory of the current state of local culture in outlying locations. They subsequently used a mixed method to analyze the consequences of interrupting generational transmission and created a model for sustainable transmission of local culture. The new generation adapts Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) as lived heritage and periodically presents newly learned knowledge of symbolic events. This symbolic reference to sustainability constitutes important argumentation in environmental communication with multiple stakeholders.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cultural Transmission in Slovak Mountain Regions: Local Knowledge as Symbolic Argumentation

Murin

2022

Palgrave Studies in Anthropology of Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Komunikasi lingkungan berdasarkan pembahasan kita adalah sebuah proses, studi, praktik, sarana, dan sistem (Jurin, Roush, & Danter, 2010). Beberapa ahli lain menambahkan dengan: melibatkan publik (Cox, 2010;Eisenhauer & Nicholson, 2007), aktivitas/fenomena (Center For Environmental Communication, 2016), dan nexus (Depoe, 2007 Memiliki peranan untuk menyelenggarakan komunikasi persuasif kepada jaringannya dengan menggunakan jaringan informasi yang organisasi ini miliki. f. Masyarakat atau komunitas lokal Model di atas menunjukkan bahwa komunikasi lingkungan melibatkan intitusi yang beragam.…”

Section: Perspektif Kolaborasi Dalam Komunikasi Lingkunganunclassified

Kolaborasi Merawat Brantas (Sebuah Studi Komunikasi Lingkungan Di Desa Sumber Brantas, Kota Batu, Jawa Timur)

Sudjoko

2018

CHANNEL: Jurnal Komunikasi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk memperkaya kajian Komunikasi Lingkungan dalam konteks Asia. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kontruktifis dengan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pemilihan informan Purposive Sampling. Metode pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan wawancara mendalam (indept interview) dan observasi partisipan (overt participant) guna mendapatkan data yang akurat dari informan sesuai dengan kebutuhan. Hasil penelitian ini adalah adanya kolaborasi antara perum Jasa Tirta, Tahura Soerya, dan masyarakat dalam merawat Daerah Aliran Sungai Brantas (DAS) yang difasilitasi oleh pemerintah desa Sumber Brantas. Kunci dari kolaborasi yang efektif dalam merawat DAS Brantas adalah: Kesadaran akan nilai strategis Brantas, pemahaman terhadap peran masing-masing intitusi, aspek budaya. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Komunikasi Lingkungan di desa Sumber Brantas dipengaruhi oleh pemahaman setiap stakeholder, nilai DAS Brantas, dan juga aspek budaya.

show abstract

“…Though scholars across communication's subdisciplines have begun to address critiques that discourse is too deterministic (Aakhus et al, ; Ashcraft, Kuhn, & Cooren, ; Biesecker & Lucaites, ; Depoe, ; Parikka, ), my aim is to distinguish a feminist new materialist approach to this problem, one with many seeds in existing communication scholarship. More than 2 decades ago, Foss () said, “Feminist scholarship … is in many ways an oxymoron” (p. 5) that inhabits an academic model largely antithetical to feminism.…”

Section: Turning Toward Feminist New Materialismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Feminist Dilemmatic Theorizing: New Materialism in Communication Studies

Harris

2015

Commun Theor

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Feminist communication scholars often adopt seemingly incommensurate stances to navigate tensions among agency, discourse, materiality, and history. I argue that valuing these "contradictions" is a hallmark of feminist communication research, a tradition I label feminist dilemmatic theorizing. Because feminists seek to describe and transform the world, they employ constitutive and representative understandings of communication. Rather than assert these approaches as paradoxical, I reread existing scholarship for nascent feminist new materialisms. Using sexual violence as an example, I argue that feminist communication theory develops a distinct approach to the force of communication, one in which discourse is not all-powerful. Accordingly, I suggest communication theorists draw upon existing feminist scholarship to meet critiques of social construction and develop a material turn.

show abstract

Environmental Communication as Nexus

Cited by 14 publications

References 4 publications

Cultural Transmission in Slovak Mountain Regions: Local Knowledge as Symbolic Argumentation

Cultural Transmission in Slovak Mountain Regions: Local Knowledge as Symbolic Argumentation

Kolaborasi Merawat Brantas (Sebuah Studi Komunikasi Lingkungan Di Desa Sumber Brantas, Kota Batu, Jawa Timur)

Feminist Dilemmatic Theorizing: New Materialism in Communication Studies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About