Environmental Assessment in New Zealand: Prospects and Practical Realities

Dixon, Jennifer; Fookes, Tom

doi:10.1080/14486563.1995.10648321

Cited by 9 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The variation in quality of section 32 reports noted by Fookes (2000) confirms a trend already discernable by the mid-1990s (Dixon and Fookes, 1995).…”

Section: Consideration Of Alternatives Benefits and Costssupporting

confidence: 60%

Applying strategic environmental assessment to land-use and resource-management plans in Scotland and New Zealand: a comparison

Jackson

Dixon

2006

Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The variation in quality of section 32 reports noted by Fookes (2000) confirms a trend already discernable by the mid-1990s (Dixon and Fookes, 1995).…”

Section: Consideration Of Alternatives Benefits and Costssupporting

confidence: 60%

Applying strategic environmental assessment to land-use and resource-management plans in Scotland and New Zealand: a comparison

Jackson

Dixon

2006

Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A number of constraints to the process were identified and are summarised in Table 2, some of which were similar to global experience (for instance, refer to Sadler, 1995;Scott, 1992;Fischer, et a1 1994;Webb and Sigal, 1992;Therivel, ct al, 1992;Dixon and Fookes, 1995;Montz and Dixon, 1993;Therivel, 1995;Partidario, 1995;Sadler aid Verheem, 1996). These are not prioritised in any manner.…”

Section: Constraints and Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strategic environmental assessment: the potential for development in South Australia

McCarthy

1996

Project Appraisal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is potential to clewlop the use of strategic environniental assessnznt (SEA) in South Australia A sursey addressed the current attitudes toivartls the need for SEA antl the preferred nrethotls of inlylenzntation at the local antl state government level and the extent of infornial practice. It ivas found that: the principles ivere supported by the nicdority of agencies; niost agencies preferred a degree of forniality in an SEA franiework, although alniost half suggested that a combination of formal and informal elements was most appropriate; the public should be in ~?olved; niost agencies are practising infornial SEA; and the niqjority lacked broad environnientnl goals as a.franiavork for assessnient. There needs to be-further research into the actual role of SEA.

show abstract

Wetlands contribution and linkage to support SDGs, its indicators and targets‐ A critical review

Mohanty,

Pandey,

Pandey

et al. 2024

Sustainable Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study marks one of the pioneering efforts to compile comprehensive information on Ramsar sites globally. It delves into the significance of wetlands and the designation of Ramsar sites across various countries, incorporating a concise exploration of the utilization of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for wetland monitoring and assessment. Additionally, the study conducts a comparative evaluation of Ramsar sites, analyzing their percentage area and overall coverage worldwide. Incorporating a Scientometric analysis utilizing the Scopus database, the study features a co‐occurrence map, thematic map, thematic evolution trend, and country collaboration map. Emphasizing the interconnection between wetlands and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG6 (Clean Water & Sanitation), SDG12 (Responsible Consumption & Production), SDG13 (Climate‐Action), SDG14 (Life Below Water) and SDG15 (Life on Land), the study delves into associated targets and indicators. Targets such as 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6a, 6b of SDG‐6, 12.1, 12.2, 12.4 of SDG‐12, and 13.2, 13.3 of SDG‐13 align with wetland management and conservation. Moreover, it affirms the role of wetlands in supporting targets 14.1, 14.2, 14.3, 14.4, 14.5, 14.6, 14a‐c of SDG‐14, and 15.1, 15.5, 15.6, 15.7, 15.8, and 15.8 of SDG‐15. Policies, regulations and management plans of different countries relevant for supporting and establishing relationship with SDGs are discussed in details. The study offers a detailed exploration of these targets, elucidating indicator types associated with each SDG target. By doing so, it provides valuable insights for future researchers and policymakers, underlining the indispensable contribution of wetlands to the direct and indirect fulfillment of SDGs 6,12,13,14,15 and 17.

show abstract

Environmental Assessment in New Zealand: Prospects and Practical Realities

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Applying strategic environmental assessment to land-use and resource-management plans in Scotland and New Zealand: a comparison

Applying strategic environmental assessment to land-use and resource-management plans in Scotland and New Zealand: a comparison

Strategic environmental assessment: the potential for development in South Australia

Wetlands contribution and linkage to support SDGs, its indicators and targets‐ A critical review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About