Environmental and techno-economic evaluation for hybrid-electric propulsion architectures

Abstract

Hybrid-electric propulsion is a promising alternative to sustainable aviation and is mainly considered for the commuter and regional aircraft class. However, the development of hybrid-electric propulsion variants is affected by the technology readiness level of electric components. The components’ technology will determine the electrification benefit, compared to a conventional aircraft, and will suggest which is the most beneficial variant and which has a closer entry into service date. Within this work, three different dates are explored, namely 2027, 2030 and 2040, to size three Parallel and three Series hybrid-electric architecture variants using an in-house aircraft sizing tool. All variants are compared to a conventional configuration sized using technological assumptions of 2014, with the main comparison metrics being the aircraft block fuel, energy consumption, direct operating cost and holistic environmental impact. On one hand, the Parallel configurations have reduced maximum take-off mass and mission energy consumption compared to the Series, however, the latter show a greater potential for block fuel reduction and require less onboard energy for the same mission. The annual operating cost evaluation indicates that the Parallel hybrid variant of 2030 has greater operational costs than the respective Series variant; however, it has reduced capital costs compared to the latter, making it more economical to operate considering both costs. Additionally, in the case of an energy recession, both hybrid variants of 2030 show a further cost reduction, with the Series having a total reduction of 10.4% excluding capital costs, compared to the reference aircraft. Moreover, the life cycle assessment shows that the Series variants have a lower environmental impact, both compared to the reference aircraft and the Parallel variants. The former could be up to 59.7% less detrimental to the environment than the reference aircraft, whereas the latter up to 23.9%, with the integration of renewable sources for electricity production. Finally, by the year 2040, the Series variant shows outstanding performance in all comparison metrics, compared to the Parallel and the reference aircraft.

Analysis of the influence of substitute fuels on properties operating conditions of military hybrid drive systems

“…On the other hand, these systems are required to achieve maximum work units, long range and lightweight construction [23]. The continuous development of hybrid systems increases the complexity of their construction [16]. The internal combustion engines themselves also use very precise power and control systems to increase thermal efficiency [20].…”

“…Thus, the most important properties of electric motors are used (maximum torque at low speed, quiet operation, and the possibility of overloading), as well as the extended range of the vehicle, thanks to the possibility of recharging the battery with a combustion generator. In addition, the electric motor can work as a generator during braking, which allows for energy recovery and lower fuel consumption [16,21]. The system with electric motors directly driving the wheels of the vehicle does not require mechanical power transmission systems (gearboxes and shafts), which allows for the reduction of the weight and size of such drive systems.…”

Odour-sensitive passenger comfort in small aircraft cabins

“…In the work of Zhang et al [27], a computational model is set, considering a slice of a large Boeing 767-300 cabin, aiming to optimise the location and determine the minimum number of odour sensors required to monitor the CAQ. However, the cabin size affects the flow field and since small aircraft, such as the commuter class, are gaining popularity over the past years for being candidates to hybridise or electrify [28][29][30], it would be interesting to examine the odour dissipation in such confined spaces. Therefore, the scope of this work is to simulate the air-conditioning flow in a small aircraft cabin and to monitor the effect of variation of cooling air mass flow and VOC concentrations on the overall VOC residence time inside the cabin, by monitoring areas of the computational grid close to the manikins' noses.…”