Environmental and Regulatory Concerns During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from the Pandemic Food and Stigma Survey

Abstract

In this article, we present data from the monthly Pandemic Food and Stigma Survey (PFSS), a nationwide representative sample of adults in the United States designed to identify how the pandemic is affecting concerns about food and the environment. Two surveys were conducted in May and June 2020. Our analysis suggests that the public’s concern about contracting COVID-19 has been high; however, infection with COVID-19 was not the only concern. A majority of respondents remained strongly concerned about environmental issues, such as climate change, while responses to sudden relaxations of environmental and food safety policies varied. We analyze the PFSS data to identify factors associated with concerns about pandemic and environmental regulatory changes. In general, we find that people whose food security has been threatened by COVID-19 remain concerned about relaxation of environmental regulations, and those most inclined to take steps to reduce spread of the virus, such as wearing masks and social distancing, are more concerned about relaxed regulations than those less willing to take mitigating actions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10640-020-00438-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

How COVID-19 affects individuals' food consumption behaviour: a consumer survey on attitudes and habits in Turkey

“…Governments around the world responded to this unprecedented event by imposing national lockdowns, home confinements, hygiene regimes and encouraging social distancing to prevent the spread of the virus (G ornicka et al, 2020;Sidor and Rzymski, 2020;Szymkowiak et al, 2020). Unlike the other emerging infectious diseases (EIDs), COVID-19 has had a huge impact not only on people's physiological and mental health but also on the global economy, the labour sector and people's daily routines (Cranfield, 2020;Galanakis, 2020;Gao et al, 2020;Kecinski et al, 2020;Loayza and Pennings, 2020).…”

“…These new restrictive measures and multiple campaigns have impacted the physical activities, mental conditions and daily routines of individuals (Di Renzo et al, 2020a;G ornicka et al, 2020;Grashuis et al, 2020;Kecinski et al, 2020;Scarmozzino and Visioli, 2020;Szymkowiak et al, 2020). These new circumstances, e.g.…”

Suggestions for a Covid-19 Post-Pandemic Research Agenda in Environmental Economics

“…Fortunately, these issues are covered to some degree by other contributions. These topics include, among others, potential changes in behavioural responses such as social norms (van Bergeijk 2020;Howarth et al 2020;Quaas et al 2020), issues related to health economics and disease transmission (Newbold et al 2020;Brock and Xepapadeas 2020;Albers et al 2020), food safety and availability (Kecinski et al 2020), impacts on the Market Stability Reserve (Gerlagh et al 2020), animal disease and wildlife meat trade (Aguirre et al 2020), the valuation of lives and the economic costs and environmental benefits of the lockdowns, stock price reactions (Ramelli and Wagner 2020) and linkages to mobility patterns (Sirkeci and Yucesahin 2020).…”

“… 2020 ), food safety and availability (Kecinski et al. 2020 ), impacts on the Market Stability Reserve (Gerlagh et al. 2020 ), animal disease and wildlife meat trade (Aguirre et al.…”

What do we know about business and economics research during COVID-19: a bibliometric review

“…Ozili (2020) added that policymakers should pay more effort to authorize social policies and communicate with citizens to reduce social anxiety. Hence, environmental aspects have been investigated by many researchers (e.g., Helm, 2020;Kecinski et al, 2020;L opez-Feldman et al, 2020) and documented in a survey that respondents remain considering the environmental aspects and climate change, even during the existing health risk. While other studies have investigated the air quality pre and during the lockdown, the outcomes reported that the air quality improved, due to the stop of vehicles, the pause of construction works reduced the dust particles (Amankwah-Amoah, 2020; Bera et al, 2021).…”