2019
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental and demographic drivers of male mating success vary across sequential reproductive episodes in a polygynous breeder

Abstract: Ecological and social factors underpinning the inequality of male mating success in animal societies can be related to sex ratio, sexual conflict between breeders, effects of nonbreeders, resource dispersion, climatic conditions, and the various sequential stages of mating competition that constitute the sexual selection process. Here, we conducted an individual‐based study to investigate how local resource availability and demography interact with annual climate conditions to determine the degree of male mati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…although bands as large as 16 horses have been observed (Manning & McLoughlin, 2017). Band memberships are stable across years but 67% of adult females have been observed to disperse to a different social band at least once during a 7-year period (Debeffe et al, 2015).…”
Section: Study Area and Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…although bands as large as 16 horses have been observed (Manning & McLoughlin, 2017). Band memberships are stable across years but 67% of adult females have been observed to disperse to a different social band at least once during a 7-year period (Debeffe et al, 2015).…”
Section: Study Area and Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we calculated the within‐year dispersion of harem sizes as the coefficient of variation in mean monthly harem size each year (CVmmhs=)(SD/truex¯0.25emmonthly harem size×100$$ {\mathrm{CV}}_{\mathrm{mmhs}}=\left(\mathrm{SD}/\overline{x}\ \mathrm{monthly}\ \mathrm{harem}\ \mathrm{size}\right)\times 100 $$) (Figure S1). We assumed that years with relatively greater dispersion reflected an increased degree of male mating inequality and opportunity for sexual selection (Emlen & Oring, 1977), which has been shown to emerge in feral horses from factors including local demography and drought conditions (Manning & McLoughlin, 2017, 2019). Lastly, because harem size is expected to vary within and among years, we calculated a monthly harem size metric for each year by first measuring the difference in mean monthly harem size (the i th month of the j th year) from the long‐term average monthly harem size over the 15‐year period (mean harem ij – 15 year monthly mean harem).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate how factors intrinsic to the population may influence the four phenology-based harem size metrics, we calculated empirical estimates of five demographic parameters annually. As harem size and the probability of acquiring harems have been linked to the adult sex ratio (ASR; proportion of adult males in the population) in other large ungulates (Bonenfant et al, 2004;Kaseda & Khalil, 1996;Manning & McLoughlin, 2019), we calculated ASR annually as the 12-month mean of the monthly proportion of adult stallions in the entire population (males ≥3 years old/[males ≥3 years old + females ≥2 years old]) (Ancona et al, 2017;Andersson, 2004;McNamara et al, 2000). We calculated annual adult mortality as the number Because age can influence a stallion's ability to retain harems and mares within harems (Bouman, 1986), we calculated the mean age of harem holding stallions during each 12-month period.…”
Section: Explanatory Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Females in the population invariably segregate across these mixedsex social bands which are comprised of the dominant stallion, adult females (mares), and subadult (<3 years of age) offspring (Regan et al, 2019). Bands can therefore be as small as 2 (one adult male and one female), although bands as large as 16 horses have been observed (Manning & McLoughlin, 2017). Band memberships are stable across years but 67% of adult females were known to disperse to a different social band at least once during a 7-year period (Debeffe, Richard, Medill, Weisgerber, & McLoughlin, 2015).…”
Section: Study Area and Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%