1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-5162(98)00022-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental and botanical controls on peatification—a comparative study of two New Zealand restiad bogs using Py-GC/MS, petrography and fungal analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…* = significant difference between sphagnan and PGA treatment (repeated measures ANOVA over first four concentrations, see Table 1), ** significant difference between adding 0 (control) and 50 mg sphagnan g -1 substrate (Student's t-test) Perhaps the most intriguing result is that there are more biochemical alternatives in the plant world leading to slow litter decomposition. In some ecosystems, such as subtropical and forested peatlands, lignin-derived soil C dominates (Kuder et al 1998;Williams et al 1998;Jin et al 2009), while in other ecosystems, such as Sphagnum-dominated bogs, polysaccharide-derived C prevails (Williams et al 1998;Yavitt et al 2005). But how can this result change our understanding of the environmental processes that control the rate of litter mineralization?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…* = significant difference between sphagnan and PGA treatment (repeated measures ANOVA over first four concentrations, see Table 1), ** significant difference between adding 0 (control) and 50 mg sphagnan g -1 substrate (Student's t-test) Perhaps the most intriguing result is that there are more biochemical alternatives in the plant world leading to slow litter decomposition. In some ecosystems, such as subtropical and forested peatlands, lignin-derived soil C dominates (Kuder et al 1998;Williams et al 1998;Jin et al 2009), while in other ecosystems, such as Sphagnum-dominated bogs, polysaccharide-derived C prevails (Williams et al 1998;Yavitt et al 2005). But how can this result change our understanding of the environmental processes that control the rate of litter mineralization?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predominantly forested tropical peat-forming environments result in wood-rich peat deposits, unlike most temperate peat deposits, which are often dominated by shrubs, grasses, and bryophytes [52]. Tropical peats are therefore often rich in lignin with only small amounts of hemicellulose, cellulose, protein, and watersoluble compounds [43,53,54], which are lost due to vigorous microbial activity. It is commonly thought that woody peats generally result in bright, vitrain-rich coal [14, page 37] and peat derived from bryophytes or Cyperaceae produce dull coal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detro-huminite is normally generated in relatively aerobic condition (Teichmüller et al 1998b). Moreover, the activities of physical breakdown of plant to particulate matrix are observed at the margin of the peat beds (Kuder et al 1998). To characterize the paleomires of the Australian Permian coals, Diessel (1986) introduced two indices, gelification index (GI) and tissue preservation index (TPI).…”
Section: Paleomiresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results obtained through the petrography-based ternary models compare well with the ones shown by GI, TPI, GWI and VI indices. The presence of framboidal pyrite indicates increasing activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria in the carbonate and sulphate rich waters of the basin at the time of peat formation (Kuder et al 1998;Teichmüller et al 1998a). Bacterial activity is the source of energy for such chemical reduction from sulphate to sulfides (Neavel 1966).…”
Section: Paleomiresmentioning
confidence: 99%