2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environment, Obesity, and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Low-Income Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
193
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
5
193
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies supported an association between mixed-use developments and increased physical activity, [47][48][49][50][51] as well as decreased obesity and obesity-related illnesses. 26,47,48,50,52,53 While these associations were consistent across studies, additional evidence from this literature suggests that these associations may be stronger for socioeconomically advantaged vs. disadvantaged populations. 26 This literature also suggests that increased mixed-use developments can be associated with increased crime.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The studies supported an association between mixed-use developments and increased physical activity, [47][48][49][50][51] as well as decreased obesity and obesity-related illnesses. 26,47,48,50,52,53 While these associations were consistent across studies, additional evidence from this literature suggests that these associations may be stronger for socioeconomically advantaged vs. disadvantaged populations. 26 This literature also suggests that increased mixed-use developments can be associated with increased crime.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For instance in the United States, southeastern and north-central regions of the country exhibit higher levels of obesity than the northeast or west even after accounting for individual-level socioeconomic and demographic characteristics (Mokdad et al, 2003(Mokdad et al, , 1999. At the neighborhood level, obesity in the United States is associated with living in neighborhoods that have a high prevalence of residents living in poverty, even after accounting for one's own SES (Mobley et al, 2006;van Lenthe and Mackenbach, 2002;Do et al, 2007). While this line of research is relatively new, initial investigations suggest that this relationship may be due in part to the lack of healthy food options in these neighborhoods that promote "obesogenic" eating patterns (Cummins and Macintyre, 2006;Ulijaszek, 2007) or to urban design characteristics that discourage physical activity (Booth et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, higher rates of overweight and obesity are associated with low socioeconomic status (SES) neighborhoods in urban centers in many developed countries including Australia, 18 Canada, 19,20 New Zealand, 21 the United Kingdom, 22 and the United States. 23,24 The pathways through which these neighborhoods shape body weight have been the focus of investigation by researchers who note that access to unhealthy foods is high, 25,26 while physical activity is limited by fear of using public space, 27,28 high levels of traffic, 29 poor walkability, 30,31 and lack of amenities. 32 Yet, while there has been an abundance of studies examining the link between environmental scale and increased rates of obesity, specific types of environments have not garnered the same attention by researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%