Human Retrotransposons in Health and Disease 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48344-3_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environment, Cellular Signaling, and L1 Activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 225 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that UV exposure could induce an increase of L1Hs promoter activity. Again, this result should not be considered relevant because choriocarcinoma cells are not a naturally UV exposed cell population; also in this case, the reason why this cell line was chosen is just because it was known to support high levels of L1 retrotransposition (Leibold et al ., ); moreover, the reporter used has some major limitations as explained by the same authors (Ade et al ., ). Similar results were obtained by Teneng et al .…”
Section: Environmental Physical Agents and Their Effect On L1‐rtpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They found that UV exposure could induce an increase of L1Hs promoter activity. Again, this result should not be considered relevant because choriocarcinoma cells are not a naturally UV exposed cell population; also in this case, the reason why this cell line was chosen is just because it was known to support high levels of L1 retrotransposition (Leibold et al ., ); moreover, the reporter used has some major limitations as explained by the same authors (Ade et al ., ). Similar results were obtained by Teneng et al .…”
Section: Environmental Physical Agents and Their Effect On L1‐rtpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a long time, it was believed that all somatic cells completely suppressed L1 activity by DNA methylation with patterns established during early gastrulation (Bestor and Bourc'his, ), differently from germinal cells which during gametogenesis could be permissive (Branciforte and Martin, ; Brouha et al ., ; Georgiou et al ., ). Currently, the conceptual model of L1 activity in the host somatic cell has changed in light of subsequent discoveries: (1) the detection of L1 activity, both in various types of cancer cells (Iskow et al ., ; Lee et al ., ; Tubio et al ., ) and in aging/senescent cells (De Cecco et al ., , , ); (2) the finding that healthy somatic cells can become permissive to L1 activity during certain developmental windows, including early embryogenesis (Prak et al ., ; Muotri et al ., ) and neurogenesis (Richardson et al ., ; Suarez et al ., ); (3) the observation that L1‐RTP occurs in cells responding to several environmental stresses (Ishizaka et al ., ; Ade et al ., ; Horváth et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation