2017
DOI: 10.14196/mjiri.31.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Envelope-based inter-aural time difference localization training to improve speech-in-noise perception in the elderly

Abstract: Background: Many elderly individuals complain of difficulty in understanding speech in noise despite having normal hearing thresholds. According to previous studies, auditory training leads to improvement in speech-in-noise perception, but these studies did not consider the etiology, so their results cannot be generalized. The present study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of envelopebased interaural time difference (ITD ENV) localization training on improving ITD threshold and speech-in-noise percepti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(36 reference statements)
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests the incidence of neural plasticity in the intervention group, which concurs with the study's main hypothesis and the results from some previous studies conducted on older adults [22,[32][33][34]. Given the lack of similar studies and since only a few studies have been conducted on spatial auditory training, studies with similar practical concepts (all conducted to improve speech in noise perception) conducted on older age groups were selected [22,31,32,[34][35][36]. The most important point extracted from these studies was that neural plasticity occurs in older adults through short-term training.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This suggests the incidence of neural plasticity in the intervention group, which concurs with the study's main hypothesis and the results from some previous studies conducted on older adults [22,[32][33][34]. Given the lack of similar studies and since only a few studies have been conducted on spatial auditory training, studies with similar practical concepts (all conducted to improve speech in noise perception) conducted on older age groups were selected [22,31,32,[34][35][36]. The most important point extracted from these studies was that neural plasticity occurs in older adults through short-term training.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For this purpose, the Pearson test was used to assess the relationship between P-SHQ score and the score of the spatial word in noise test among three groups. For the interpretation of these results, it should be noted that the relationship between the objective and self-assessment tests depends on their validity [7,13]. In this study, the tests with high levels of reliability and validity were selected [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various behavioral (psychophysical) tests have been introduced for the assessment of spatial hearing including the Masking Level Difference (MLD), the Dichotic Digits test (DDT), the minimum audible angle (MAA), the Listening in Specialized Noise test (LiSN), and the spatial word recognition score [6][7][8]. On the other hand, various self-report assessment tools have been introduced for investigating the spatial hearing disabilities including the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) and the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this formula, the studied variable is the extent of informational masking changes before and after the intervention. There is no previous study, which was used the same training as this study proposes; therefore, we considered the study of Delphi et al which was on a group of elderly individuals 44 . In her study the mean and standard deviation of the improvement in the main variable were 37.5 and 25.17 in the experimental group and 25.17 and 18.15 in the control group, respectively.…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%