1951
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1951.01700010455011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enucleation and Cosmetic Rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1952
1952
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept that the surgeon should replace what is removed by enucleation dates back to 1951 when the volume of the globe was thought to be 6.5 mL. 1 The concepts that total volume replacement should be the goal of rehabilitation and that doing so reduces superior sulcus deformity and enophthalmos have been reintroduced in the recent literature. [2][3][4] State-of-the-art enucleation prior to 1999 involved removal of the eye without consideration of the volume that was removed nor the distribution of the replacement volume between the implant and the prosthesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept that the surgeon should replace what is removed by enucleation dates back to 1951 when the volume of the globe was thought to be 6.5 mL. 1 The concepts that total volume replacement should be the goal of rehabilitation and that doing so reduces superior sulcus deformity and enophthalmos have been reintroduced in the recent literature. [2][3][4] State-of-the-art enucleation prior to 1999 involved removal of the eye without consideration of the volume that was removed nor the distribution of the replacement volume between the implant and the prosthesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%