2017
DOI: 10.1026/1612-5010/a000202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Entwicklung und Validierung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung von Sportinteressen im Jugendalter (SPIT)

Abstract: Zusammenfassung. Interessen sind in der Berufs- und pädagogischen Psychologie, nicht aber in der Sportpsychologie, ein zentrales Persönlichkeitskonstrukt zur Erklärung menschlichen Erlebens und Verhaltens. Der Sportinteressentest (SPIT) ist auf der Basis der Theorie von Holland (1997) und der Konditionsfaktoren Ausdauer, Schnelligkeit, Koordination und Kraft zur Erfassung sportbezogener Interessen entwickelt und an 1 243 Jugendlichen teststatistisch überprüft worden. In konfirmatorischen Faktorenanalysen erwie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, some questionnaires lack a theoretical background (e.g., Gill et al, 1983). Second, some questionnaires have a rather low test efficiency (e.g., Schmid et al, 2017), which might lead to acceptance problems in the field of practice as well as research. Third, several questionnaires show critical test-statistical criteria, such as low internal consistency (e.g., Gill et al, 1983; Steffgen et al, 2000; Ingledew and Sullivan, 2002) or restricted factorial validity (e.g., Kueh et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, some questionnaires lack a theoretical background (e.g., Gill et al, 1983). Second, some questionnaires have a rather low test efficiency (e.g., Schmid et al, 2017), which might lead to acceptance problems in the field of practice as well as research. Third, several questionnaires show critical test-statistical criteria, such as low internal consistency (e.g., Gill et al, 1983; Steffgen et al, 2000; Ingledew and Sullivan, 2002) or restricted factorial validity (e.g., Kueh et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%